entailment-from-inconsistent-graph [was: proposed test of RDFS entailment rules]


The WG were unable to discuss this suggestion before publishing the 2nd 
last call documents.  I propose to track this as a 2nd last call comment:


Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> I propose that the following be a positive entailment test in the RDF test
> suite.  This is a valid RDFS entailment (modulo typing errors), but is not
> a consequence of the current RDFS entailment rules.
> Premise
> <http://example.org/prop> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral> .
> <http://example.org/foo> <http://example.org/prop> "<"^^<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral> .
> Conclusion
> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> .
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2003 09:37:54 UTC