- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:44:55 +0100
- To: Carlos Viegas Damásio <cd@di.fct.unl.pt>
- Cc: "'Dave Beckett'" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, "'www-rdf-comments'" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Carlos, Since we are in last call, I need to create evidence whether or not we have addressed comments received to the commentors satisfaction. Dave has agreed that there is a bug and proposed to fix it [[ Yes that's correct - an editorial error I'll fix for the next version to be: datatypeString ::= '"' string '"' ^^' uriref at http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-testcases-20031010/#datatypeString ]] [1] If you can say on record that you are happy with that fix then I can update my disposition of comments doc [2] to show that you are satisfied that we have addressed your comment. Brian [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0044.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20031010-comments/#datatypeString-production Carlos Viegas Damásio wrote: > Dear Brian and Dave, > > >>Carlos, >> >>I trust that changes resolves your comment? >> >>Brian > > > In fact, I made a cut-and paste error. > It is missing a ' before ^^. > The production should be > > datatypeString ::= '"' string '"' '^^' uriref > > Sorry for the disturbance. > > Carlos > >>Dave Beckett wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:29:02 +0100 >>>Carlos Viegas Damásio <cd@di.fct.unl.pt> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Dear editors, >>>> >>>>Production datatypeString in RDF Test Cases (2003/09/05) is: >>>> >>>>datatypeString ::= string '^^' uriref >>>> >>>>Shouldn_t it be: >>>> >>>>datatypeString ::= '"' string '"' ^^' uriref >>>> >>>>as in literal production ? >>>>Otherwise, the RDF testcases are wrong. >>> >>> >>>Yes that's correct - an editorial error I'll fix for the next version > > to be: > >>> datatypeString ::= '"' string '"' ^^' uriref >>>at > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-testcases-20031010/#datatypeString > >>>Thanks for the comment >>> >>>Dave >>
Received on Friday, 17 October 2003 05:46:21 UTC