www-qa-wg@w3.org from April 2005 by author

boland@nist.gov

• CSS examples of umbrella specifications? (Thursday, 28 April)

Chris Lilley

• Re: SVG Tiny 1.2: reviewers guide (Wednesday, 20 April)
• SVG Tiny 1.2: reviewers guide (Saturday, 16 April)

david_marston@us.ibm.com

• Re: [Draft-SpecGL] Umbrella specifications (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: oddities in our Conformance Model (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Addressing accessibility in SpecGL (was: Draft minutes telcon 20050411) (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Test FAQ - results vs. outcomes (Sunday, 10 April)

Dimitris Dimitriadis

• Re: [draft] Agenda: May 2nd 2005 QA WG Teleconf (Saturday, 30 April)
• Re: SpecGL implementation report, first version (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: SpecGL implementation report, first version (Monday, 25 April)
• SpecGL implementation report, first version (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: SpecGL ICS for SpecGL (Friday, 22 April)
• Final minutes QA WG telcon 20050411 (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Final Agenda: April 18th 2005 QA WG teleconf and AI completed (Monday, 18 April)
• Draft minutes telcon 20050411 (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: Final Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf (Monday, 11 April)
• My action item AI-20050404-20 is done (Monday, 11 April)

Dominique Hazaël-Massieux

• Re: Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson Structure Numbering Confusin g (Friday, 29 April)
• SpecGL: next steps (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [Draft-SpecGL] Umbrella specifications (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Proposed revised "status of this document" (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [draft] answers to multiple WAI CG comments re: SpecGL (Monday, 25 April)
• RE: SpecGL ICS for SpecGL (Monday, 25 April)
• [draft] Proposed answer to TAG issue on SpecGL ICS (Monday, 25 April)
• SpecGL ICS for SpecGL (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: oddities in our Conformance Model (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: oddities in our Conformance Model (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE 1148 - Text difficult to understand in the example (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: [draft] Answer to comment about "Non-specification specifications" (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE 1149 - Example about Unicode (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE 1148 - Text difficult to understand in the example (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Status of proposed answers (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] Proposed answer to TAG comment on using our own example (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] Proposed answer to TAG comment on error processing requirements (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] Proposed answer to TAG comment on editorial comments (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] Proposed answer to TAG comment on extensions and conformance (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] Proposed answer to TAG issue on positive statements for non applicability (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] Proposed answer to DanC's comment on untested hooks (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Sending and announcing final teleconf minutes (Monday, 18 April)
• Final Agenda: April 18th 2005 QA WG teleconf (Monday, 18 April)
• New SpecGL WG Draft (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: Proposal re: AI-20050411-1 (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: Proposal re: AI-20050411-1 (Friday, 15 April)
• Addressing accessibility in SpecGL (was: Draft minutes telcon 20050411) (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Draft Agenda: April 18th 2005 QA WG teleconf (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Proposed assignments for drafting answers to LC comments (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Final Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf (Monday, 11 April)
• starting Disposition of Comments document (Monday, 11 April)
• Draft Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: definition of Specficiation (Friday, 8 April)
• Editors draft of test faq on QA WG site (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: New draft of Test FAQ: for discussion during April 4 telecon (Monday, 4 April)

Karl Dubost

• Re: CSS examples of umbrella specifications? (Friday, 29 April)
• [draft] answer to Dave Marston comment on Conformance section for a technology or for a specification (005) (Friday, 29 April)
• [draft] answer to Dave Marston comment on What's a core module (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: [draft] Agenda: May 2nd 2005 QA WG Teleconf (Friday, 29 April)
• [draft] answer to TAG, Marston comment on Suggestions of examples for section 2.3 (Friday, 29 April)
• [draft] answer to TAG comment on Text in example of section 2.3 needs fixing (Friday, 29 April)
• [draft] Agenda: May 2nd 2005 QA WG Teleconf (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: [Draft-SpecGL] Umbrella specifications version 2 (Wednesday, 27 April)
• [Draft-SpecGL] Umbrella specifications (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: [www-qa-wg] <none> (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [www-qa-wg] <none> (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Conformance Table (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: SpecGL implementation report, first version (Monday, 25 April)
• [FINAL] Agenda: April 25th 2005 QA WG teleconf (Modifié par Karl Dubost) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: change to SpecGL Requirement 03 re: Issue 1089? (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: New draft of Test FAQ (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: SpecGL ICS for SpecGL (Friday, 22 April)
• [DRAFT] Agenda: April 25th 2005 QA WG teleconf (Thursday, 21 April)
• Time frame for the comment answers to QA Spec GL (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: SVG Tiny 1.2: reviewers guide (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE 1148 - Text difficult to understand in the example (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: ISSUE 1148 - Text difficult to understand in the example (Wednesday, 20 April)
• ISSUE 1149 - Example about Unicode (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] answer to TAG comment on ICS needs more than y/n/n-a (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] answer to TAG comment on Conformance clause optionality (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] answer to TAG comment on wording in tips (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] Proposed answer to TAG comment on workflow (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] answer to TAG comment on a more detailed table of contents (Tuesday, 19 April)
• ISSUE 1148 - Text difficult to understand in the example (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] answer to TAG comment on unclear legend for illustration section 4.1 (Tuesday, 19 April)

Kennedy, Richard T

• RE: [DRAFT] Agenda: April 25th 2005 QA WG teleconf (Friday, 22 April)
• Final Minutes - QA Working Group Teleconference 04-April-2005 (Monday, 18 April)
• Draft Minutes - QA Working Group Teleconference - 04-April-2005 (Tuesday, 5 April)

Lofton Henderson

• Re: Conformance Table (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [www-qa-wg] <none> (Tuesday, 26 April)
• style and markup for RFC keywords (Monday, 25 April)
• Final Minutes -- QA Working Group Teleconference 2005-04-18 (Monday, 25 April)
• RE: SpecGL ICS for SpecGL (Monday, 25 April)
• [www-qa-wg] <none> (Sunday, 24 April)
• Re: oddities in our Conformance Model (Wednesday, 20 April)
• oddities in our Conformance Model (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Draft Minutes -- QA Working Group Teleconference 2005-04-18 (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: SpecGL ICS and SVG Tiny 1.2 -- p.s. (Tuesday, 12 April)
• SpecGL ICS and SVG Tiny 1.2 (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: Draft minutes telcon 20050411 (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: Final Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf (Monday, 11 April)
• old issues CR45 - CR57 (Monday, 11 April)
• Dublin Consensus: Mon-Wed (8-10 August) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• final decision -- Aug f2f days (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: New draft of Test FAQ: for discussion during April 4 telecon (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: Preliminary agenda: April 4 2005 QA WG teleconf (Sunday, 3 April)

Lynne Rosenthal

• Final Minutes QA WG Teleconference 25 April 2005 (Saturday, 30 April)
• Re: oddities in our Conformance Model (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Dublin Consensus: Mon-Wed (8-10 August) (Friday, 15 April)
• Test FAQ - example of test suite with versions (Tuesday, 5 April)

Lynne S. Rosenthal

• Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Modesty requirement (Friday, 29 April)
• Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson:Formal vs prose language nor mativity (Friday, 29 April)
• Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Additions to "write tests" (Friday, 29 April)
• Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Additions to error mechanis m section (Friday, 29 April)
• Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Correction to example about CSS extensibility (Friday, 29 April)
• Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Avoiding device-dependent p rofiles (Friday, 29 April)
• Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Case of RFC2119 terms (Friday, 29 April)
• Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Comment about HTML spec exa mples needs refinement (Friday, 29 April)
• Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Scope also helps reviewers determine when the specificati... (Friday, 29 April)
• Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson: Conformance is not a yes/no proposition (wrt filling an ICS) (Friday, 29 April)
• Draft Proposed Answer to Ian Hickson Structure Numbering Confusin g (Friday, 29 April)
• DRAFT minutes: QA WG Teleconference 25 April 2005 (Monday, 25 April)
• RE: SpecGL ICS for SpecGL (Monday, 25 April)
• RE: New draft of Test FAQ (Friday, 22 April)
• RE: change to SpecGL Requirement 03 re: Issue 1089? (Friday, 22 April)
• RE: Draft Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf (Friday, 8 April)

Mark W. Skall

• RE: Final Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf (Monday, 11 April)

Patrick Curran

• Re: SpecGL implementation report, first version (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: New draft of Test FAQ (Friday, 22 April)
• New draft of Test FAQ (Friday, 22 April)
• [revised draft] Answer to comment about "Non-specification specifications" (Wednesday, 20 April)
• [draft] Answer to comment about "Non-specification specifications" (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] Answer to comment on the term "Umbrella specification" (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] Answer to comment on "parsing the definition of specification" (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] Answer to comment on "confusing structure and numbering" (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [draft] Answer to comment on "Specifying conformance" wording (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Dublin Consensus: Mon-Wed (8-10 August) (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: Final Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: New draft of Test FAQ: for discussion during April 4 telecon (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: Test FAQ - example of test suite with versions (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: Draft Minutes - QA Working Group Teleconference - 04-April-2005 (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: Editors draft of test faq on QA WG site (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: examples for TestFAQ (Monday, 4 April)
• Final agenda: April 4 2005 QA WG teleconf (Monday, 4 April)
• New draft of Test FAQ: for discussion during April 4 telecon (Monday, 4 April)
• Preliminary agenda: April 4 2005 QA WG teleconf (Sunday, 3 April)

skall@nist.gov

• Re: [draft] Agenda: May 2nd 2005 QA WG Teleconf (Saturday, 30 April)

Tim Boland

• [draft] answers to multiple WAI CG comments re: SpecGL (Friday, 22 April)
• change to SpecGL Requirement 03 re: Issue 1089? (Thursday, 21 April)
• Proposal re: AI-20050411-1 (Thursday, 14 April)
• examples for TestFAQ (Monday, 4 April)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 April 2005 20:11:53 UTC