Re: ISSUE 1148 - Text difficult to understand in the example

Le 20 avr. 2005,  05:08, Dominique Hazal-Massieux a crit :

> Le mardi 19 avril 2005  14:19 -0400, Karl Dubost a crit :
>> I need an answer on that to be able to draft an answer to the TAG. The
>> prose comes from the Bjrn Hrhmann's mail.
> I can't find the said prose in Bjrn's message...

This is also where things get even trickier than above. The definition
clearly refers to URI References, so

   <!DOCTYPE example PUBLIC "..." "">

would be allowed as "" is a legal URI
Reference. But it is not, the specification points out,

   It is an error for a fragment identifier (beginning
   with a # character) to be part of a system identifier.

Karl Dubost -
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:12:10 UTC