- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 07:12:02 -0400
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Le 20 avr. 2005, à 05:08, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux a écrit : > Le mardi 19 avril 2005 à 14:19 -0400, Karl Dubost a écrit : >> I need an answer on that to be able to draft an answer to the TAG. The >> prose comes from the Björn Hörhmann's mail. >> http://www.w3.org/mid/41aa64e7.1905102963@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de > > I can't find the said prose in Björn's message... [[[ This is also where things get even trickier than above. The definition clearly refers to URI References, so <!DOCTYPE example PUBLIC "..." "http://www.example.org/#foo"> <example/> would be allowed as "http://www.example.org/#foo" is a legal URI Reference. But it is not, the specification points out, [...] It is an error for a fragment identifier (beginning with a # character) to be part of a system identifier. [...] ]]] -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2005 11:12:10 UTC