Draft Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf

QAWG telecon participants --

   Here is the agenda for Monday teleconf, April 11th 2005.

Dimitris, you're up to be the scribe; if you can't do it for some
reason, please make sure to contact the next persons on the list until
someone is available.
http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/minuters 

The principal topic will be SpecGL LC issues resolution; issues list:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=QA&content=

Agenda
   =====
   Scribe: Dimitris Dimitriadis, Lofton Henderson
   Chair: Dom
   Template: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/telcon-template.txt


1.) roll call 11am EDT, membership

2.) routine business
        * mention on final Dublin F2F dates; progress on organization?
	* Test FAQ progress?
	* Tim's questions wrt WCAG2
http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.1.5.2.20050324090705.00b1fdc0@mailserver.nist.gov

3.) SpecGL issues
Only 2 left!
#995 - Old potential Issues
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=995
	* Lofton was to review CR45 to CR57 to see whether he agrees they ought
to be closed as no longer relevant
http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/cr-issues.html#x45

#1089 - Address accessibility requirements
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1087
	* We agreed during our discussion with the WAI CG to include in our new
"Beyond conformance" section to include a new subsection about
accessibility and possibly other horizontal domains considerations;
let's try to quickly think about what to present and how to present it,
and get someone an action item to draft a proposal



Implementation of resolved issues:
* Editors version has an updated table of contents, and a separate list
of requirements/good practices; comments/suggestions?
http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/#table-contents

* Editors version has an updated ICS:
 http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/specgl-ics 
with a new "Comments" column, and text inciting to link back to the
reviewed specification;
-> comments/suggestions?
-> a volunteer to complete SpecGL own ICS?

* More generally, we need as many people reading the document from top
to bottom to find inconsistencies, etc. due to the # of changes in the
text organization

* Responding to commenters, starting Disposition of Comments
-> needs several volunteers to draft answers to commenters [@@@ I will
send draft DoC before teleconf]
-> how to point people to implemented changes:
  * intermediate WD on /TR/? (cf 3 months rule)
  * WG draft in QA space?

   Logistics
   =====
   Zakim bridge: +1-617-761-6200
   11:00am-12noon EST.
   code: 7294 ("QAWG")
   IRC, see: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2001/12/07-QA-logistics#telcon

-- 
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org