Le lundi 25 avril 2005 à 07:38 -0400, Lynne S. Rosenthal a écrit : > Yes I agree, the way we wrote the requirements, they are in the form of test > assertions. I think I would disagree on this; last time, going from the conformance requirements to test assertions wasn't that trivial, and I think we're in the same situation here (i.e. the imperatives are conformance requirements, not test assertions). Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Monday, 25 April 2005 12:25:21 UTC