[draft] Proposed answer to TAG comment on using our own example

Original comment (issue 1155):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0011.html

The QA Working Group agrees that being more specific about the story can
only helps understand the point made and is now making an explicit
reference to itself in the text:
    In 2004, QA Working Group documents entered Candidate
    Recommendation prior to a thorough quality review, resulting in a
    huge number of issues to resolve and the eventual retreat back to
    Working Draft for major revisions.
http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/#practice-principle

(while the story doesn't exactly match the reality of what happened, the
QA Working Group believes it can still be used as a fair illustration of
the point made)
-- 
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org