- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:32:15 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: "'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1113388335.3928.111.camel@stratustier>
Hi Lofton, Le lundi 11 avril 2005 à 17:53 -0600, Lofton Henderson a écrit : > At 06:39 PM 4/11/2005 +0300, Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote: > >[...] > >#1087 - Address accessibility requirements > >http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1087 > > * We agreed during our discussion with the WAI CG to include in > > our new > >"Beyond conformance" section to include a new subsection about > >accessibility and possibly other horizontal domains considerations; > > Did we actually agree to that? Or did we just say that we'd consider > it? My recollection is that we agreed to do that. > >let's try to quickly think about what to present and how to present it, > >and get someone an action item to draft a proposal > >(dh) Can we quickly see what should appear in this section and see who > >can make a draft? Right now we have wording such as "define internal > >process" and "do a thorough review". Add a bit of verbiage explaining > >more about this. > >(tb) I can take a stab at it. > > This does not feel smart to me, adding a potentially controversial section > of new stuff after Last Call, when we're considering going to PR. Why should this be controversial? I think the idea is mainly to give pointers to XAG and the PF WG wrt accessibility; we certainly don't want to go to deep in the details, simply elaborate a bit on what we said in the intro. > Yes, it > would be non-normative, but still...I feel that we are taking a risk with > our plans and schedule. I agree there is certain risk with regard to our schedule; I suggest that we wait for Tim's proposal, and if you still think it's too new/controversial, we can still decide to revert our resolution. > How about this idea instead, as a compromise ... invite WAI to write some > sort of document about quality & accessibility, and maintain it in their > Web space, and promise a reference and link to it from SpecGL? That's basically what we're going to do; i.e. link to XAG (XML Accessibility Guidelines), and the WAI Protocol & Formats Working Group. Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2005 10:32:17 UTC