[draft] Proposed answer to TAG comment on workflow

Original comment (issue 1144 [1]):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0000.html


As a response to your comment where it was pointed out that the 
specification was mixing workflow and specification editing, the QA 
Working Group has accepted your comment and decided to create a new 
section which is not mandatory : "Beyond Conformance."[2]
	
This section contains previous Good Practices which were workflow 
related and that a WG might want to explore during the specification 
editing. Some of the good practices have been rewritten as well to 
remove their workflow orientation when it was not necessary.

You might want to take a look at the table of changes[3] to not be lost.

[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1144
[2] http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/#beyond-conformance
[3] http://www.w3.org/QA/2005/04/specgl-table.html


-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***