Re: New draft of Test FAQ: for discussion during April 4 telecon

Small editorial suggestion...

At 11:42 PM 4/3/2005 -0700, Patrick Curran wrote:
>[...]
>
>
>14. Should we implement a branding or certification program?
>
>
>
>
>
>While you may not want to define and implement a fully-fledged program 
>with all of the legal and administrative overhead that this implies, a 
>simple logo or icon that can be displayed on a web-page ("compatible with 
>xxx") may be useful. Note that whatever program you implement should 
>probably involve self certification (you do not want to be in the business 
>of certifying implementations as conformant, since this is legally risky).
>
>For a discussion of the issues involved in certification programs see 
><http://www.w3.org/2003/04/certif>here. See the 
><http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fvalidator.w3.org%2F>W3C 
>XHTML validator program and the 
><http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG1-Conformance.html>Web Content Accessibility 
>Group's logo program for examples of successful logo programs.

A link to the QAH discussion of logos might be useful.  If you agree, 
replace the word "here" with "this certification study" (leaving link the 
same).  And append after "here":

".  For a discussion of branding and logos, see also The QA Handbook."

Link "The QA Handbook" to:

http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-qa-handbook-20041122/#gp-branding-policy

(Feel free to play with the exact wording so that the whole paragraph flows 
better.)

-Lofton.