RE: Draft Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf

Regrets. 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-qa-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-qa-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf
> Of Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 6:07 AM
> To: www-qa-wg@w3.org; Dimitris Dimitriadis
> Subject: Draft Agenda: April 11th 2005 QA WG teleconf
> 
> QAWG telecon participants --
> 
>    Here is the agenda for Monday teleconf, April 11th 2005.
> 
> Dimitris, you're up to be the scribe; if you can't do it for some
> reason, please make sure to contact the next persons on the list until
> someone is available.
> http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/minuters
> 
> The principal topic will be SpecGL LC issues resolution; issues list:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=rele
> vance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=QA&content=
> 
> Agenda
>    =====
>    Scribe: Dimitris Dimitriadis, Lofton Henderson
>    Chair: Dom
>    Template: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/telcon-template.txt
> 
> 
> 1.) roll call 11am EDT, membership
> 
> 2.) routine business
>         * mention on final Dublin F2F dates; progress on organization?
> 	* Test FAQ progress?
> 	* Tim's questions wrt WCAG2
> http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.1.5.2.20050324090705.00b1fdc0@mailserver.nist.go
> v
> 
> 3.) SpecGL issues
> Only 2 left!
> #995 - Old potential Issues
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=995
> 	* Lofton was to review CR45 to CR57 to see whether he agrees they
> ought
> to be closed as no longer relevant
> http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/cr-issues.html#x45
> 
> #1089 - Address accessibility requirements
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1087
> 	* We agreed during our discussion with the WAI CG to include in our
> new
> "Beyond conformance" section to include a new subsection about
> accessibility and possibly other horizontal domains considerations;
> let's try to quickly think about what to present and how to present it,
> and get someone an action item to draft a proposal
> 
> 
> 
> Implementation of resolved issues:
> * Editors version has an updated table of contents, and a separate list
> of requirements/good practices; comments/suggestions?
> http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/#table-contents
> 
> * Editors version has an updated ICS:
>  http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/specgl-ics
> with a new "Comments" column, and text inciting to link back to the
> reviewed specification;
> -> comments/suggestions?
> -> a volunteer to complete SpecGL own ICS?
> 
> * More generally, we need as many people reading the document from top
> to bottom to find inconsistencies, etc. due to the # of changes in the
> text organization
> 
> * Responding to commenters, starting Disposition of Comments
> -> needs several volunteers to draft answers to commenters [@@@ I will
> send draft DoC before teleconf]
> -> how to point people to implemented changes:
>   * intermediate WD on /TR/? (cf 3 months rule)
>   * WG draft in QA space?
> 
>    Logistics
>    =====
>    Zakim bridge: +1-617-761-6200
>    11:00am-12noon EST.
>    code: 7294 ("QAWG")
>    IRC, see: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2001/12/07-QA-logistics#telcon
> 
> --
> Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
> W3C/ERCIM
> mailto:dom@w3.org

Received on Friday, 8 April 2005 12:06:11 UTC