W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2005

Re: SpecGL implementation report, first version

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:07:08 -0400
Message-Id: <f89156815a2491b97219a6a3435b63bb@w3.org>
To: 'www-qa-wg@w3.org' <www-qa-wg@w3.org>

Le 25 avr. 2005, à 03:56, Dimitris Dimitriadis a écrit :
> Karl's implementation report of xml:id [4], the SISR Conformance 
> assessment [5] and my own findings.

My report has been done on XML id, 2004-11-09

> [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-id/2004Dec/0009

Dimitris, You say "NO" in Requirement 08 for XML:id  with the following 

[[[There are a few "RFC2119:SHOULD" in your specification in the 
section 4. Though the conformance section doesn't explain if a 
conformant XML Processor have to implement all MUST only or MUST and 
SHOULD. This could be also solved by making a Basic Level and a Full 
level of Conformance. Or just indicate that the "MUST" MUST be 
implemented to be conformant.]]]

Is it done against this version, maybe it solves your answer:

Conformance to constraints that “must” be assured is mandatory. It is 
recommended that applications assure the other constraints as well. 
This specification defines no simply optional constraints.

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 25 April 2005 15:07:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:39 UTC