[draft] answer to TAG comment on Text in example of section 2.3 needs fixing

Original comment (issue 1148 [1]):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0012.html

As a response to your comment, the QA Working Group has accepted your 
comment and has decided to drop the specific example which was indeed 
not clear without more context.

[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1148
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#ref-define-ex



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Friday, 29 April 2005 13:51:16 UTC