- From: Lynne S. Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 08:48:05 -0400
- To: "'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <60DE4C815920CA41AF6CC5CFDA9CC849BBBDBC@WSXG03.campus.nist.gov>
[1] Original comment (issue 1048 [1]) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Jan/0013.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Jan/0013.html> Thank you for your comment, which the QA Working Group has accepted with modification. The comment is a good one, but a bit out of scope since it is about how to write good tests. However, we have reworded the affected section to clarify and it now reads [2] " What does it mean? For each feature, the Working Group might seek early implementation to demonstrate the feature. If early implementations are not available (e.g., due to commercial constraints, IPR, etc.), it is beneficial to write test cases to illustrate a concept or use case of the technology. This provides a way to to study the interactions between the different parts of the specification and reveal problems. Additionally, these test cases can be incorporated into a test suite." [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1048 <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1048> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#write-sample-gp <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#write-sample-gp>
Received on Friday, 29 April 2005 12:48:14 UTC