[draft] Proposed answer to TAG comment on extensions and conformance

Original comment (issue 1150):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0005.html

The QA Working Group agrees that the wording was too limitative, and has
now reworded Good Practice 19 as follows:
   Good Practice 19:
     Warn extension creators to create extensions that do not interfere
     with conformance
and complemented by the following text in the "what does it mean":
    Extensions can be created in different contexts: directly by
    implementers, in other specifications, etc
http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/#breaking-conformance-gp

-- 
Dominique Haza√ęl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org

Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2005 12:14:30 UTC