- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:11:55 +0200
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1113387115.3928.91.camel@stratustier>
Hi QA WG, As mentioned during the previous teleconf [1], we need to draft answers to the Last Call comments we received; among other things, this will allow us to complete our disposition of comments [2] (esp. the resolution and originator's reply columns) and request a transition to our next step, Proposed Recommendation. You'll find at the end of this message proposed assignments for drafting these answers; feel free to start your assignment before Monday teleconf, but we'll discuss the topic Monday in any case; this will be also a good time to try to trade your assignments if you want so. Drafting an answer basically means: * re-reading the email originally sent (linked in the 2nd column of [2]), and the related bugzilla entry (linked in the 1st column) * try to summarize in a more formal way what the resolution appearing in bugzilla says, and esp. with links to the actual implementations in the SpecGL Editors draft [3], and with a qualification of whether our resolution is in complete agreement with the commenter, somewhat in agreement but with a different answer that the one proposed by the commenter, or simply in disagreement * send the resulting answer to www-qa-wg for review The specific goals of these drafts messages are: * to make sure we have a well-understood resolution for each issue * to make that each resolution was indeed implemented in the Editors Draft * to ask our commenters to say whether they agree with our resolution I suggest we *don't need* to bother with the introductory part of the messages for the time being (wrt deadline for replying, LC context, etc.); let's only deal with the technical aspects. Based on [2], I've tried to assign who should draft answers to the comments, either based on their history with the issues and commenters, and simply to get a bit of work to others as well :): * Karl: Dave Marston's and TAG/1148, 1149, 1144, 1145, 1146, 1147, 1156, 1157 * Dom: DanC's and TAG/1151, 1143, 1150, 1152, 1153, 1154, 1155, 1158 * Tim: WAI CG * Richard: XML Core/Paul Grosso (#1052), XML Schema (1080, 1081) * Lofton: Jeremy Carroll, Bjoern's * Lynne: Ian Hickson * Patrick: Gary Feldman (I didn't assign anything to Dimitris since he's working on the Implementation Report which is already a pretty big piece of work) Dom 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Apr/0028.html 2. http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/04/SpecGL-DoC.html 3. http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/ -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2005 10:11:58 UTC