Thursday, 31 August 2000
- meta tag key words
- Re: XHTML 1.1 : no frames
- Re: XHTML 1.1 : no frames
- Frames & Layers
- Re: XHTML 1.1 : no frames
- RE: XHTML 1.1 : no frames
- Re: XHTML 1.1 : no frames
- Re: XHTML 1.1 : no frames
- Re: XHTML 1.1 : no frames
- XHTML
- XHTML 1.1 : no frames
- RE: the 'target' attribute
Wednesday, 30 August 2000
Tuesday, 29 August 2000
Monday, 28 August 2000
Saturday, 26 August 2000
- Re: Idea for feature: a <NEXTPAGE> tag to indicate natural next page
- Re: Idea for feature: a <NEXTPAGE> tag to indicate natural next page
- Idea for feature: a <NEXTPAGE> tag to indicate natural next page
Friday, 25 August 2000
Thursday, 24 August 2000
Wednesday, 23 August 2000
- Error in XHTML 1.0 script example
- border attribute for table element in XHTML
- Changing color of links with style sheets . . .
Tuesday, 22 August 2000
- [www-html] <none>
- RE: FIELDSET in IE versus Netscape
- RE: FIELDSET in IE versus Netscape
- RE: FIELDSET in IE versus Netscape
- RE: FIELDSET in IE versus Netscape
- FIELDSET in IE versus Netscape
- Substitution for Frames
- RE: Identify Frames early ?
- Re: Identify Frames early ?
- Re: Identify Frames early ?
Monday, 21 August 2000
Sunday, 20 August 2000
Friday, 18 August 2000
Thursday, 17 August 2000
- overflow: scroll question (was Another frames question (sorry))
- Re: Missing border-shape property in CSS2
- Missing border-shape property in CSS2
- RE: linking in frames
- RE: linking in frames
- linking in frames
- Re: Betr.: RE: Another frames question (sorry)
Wednesday, 16 August 2000
Monday, 14 August 2000
Wednesday, 16 August 2000
- RE: [Moderator Action] Another frames question (sorry)
- Re: [Moderator Action] Another frames question (sorry)
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: [Moderator Action] Another frames question (sorry)
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: [Moderator Action] Another frames question (sorry)
- Re: [Moderator Action] Another frames question (sorry)
- Re: [Moderator Action] Another frames question (sorry)
- Re: [Moderator Action] Another frames question (sorry)
Tuesday, 15 August 2000
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- IBM's developerWorks provides online resources for webmasters
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: [Moderator Action] Another frames question (sorry)
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
Friday, 11 August 2000
Tuesday, 15 August 2000
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: Extending HTML yourself [was: New XHTML 1.1 Attribute]
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: justification/reasoning of tags in XHTML forced to be lowercase?
- Re: justification/reasoning of tags in XHTML forced to be lowercase?
Monday, 14 August 2000
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: justification/reasoning of tags in XHTML forced to be lowercase?
- RE: justification/reasoning of tags in XHTML forced to be lower case?
- justification/reasoning of tags in XHTML forced to be lowercase?
Sunday, 13 August 2000
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
Saturday, 12 August 2000
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: Extending HTML yourself [was: New XHTML 1.1 Attribute]
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: Extending HTML yourself [was: New XHTML 1.1 Attribute]
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
Friday, 11 August 2000
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Extending HTML yourself [was: New XHTML 1.1 Attribute]
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- Re: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
- XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute
Thursday, 10 August 2000
- browser detection
- Re: error in xhtml 1.0 strict DTD?
- RE: error in xhtml 1.0 strict DTD?
- error in xhtml 1.0 strict DTD?
Wednesday, 9 August 2000
- RE: question on URI redirect
- Re: question on URI redirect
- question on URI redirect
- Re: [XHTMLMOD] all PE names need world-unique prefixes
- Re: [XHTMLMOD] all PE names need world-unique prefixes
Tuesday, 8 August 2000
Friday, 4 August 2000
- RE: checkbox event handler
- RE: checkbox event handler
- Scripting Examples Should be Non-Normative?
- RE: checkbox event handler
- checkbox event handler
- CfP W3C Device Independent Authoring Workshop