- From: Bertilo Wennergren <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
- Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 10:21:27 +0200
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
Dan Connolly:
> If/when folks get comfortable with schemas and
> namespaces, we can drop the DTD gobbledygook at the top:
> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
> <head>
> <title>Virtual Library</title>
> </head>
> <body>
> <p>Moved to <a href="http://vlib.org/">vlib.org</a>.</p>
> </body>
> </html>
> That's pretty darn close to what people are currently
> taught as an intro to HTML:
Indeed. This discussion has been surprisingly interesting and
educational for me. The stuff that Dan is providing really opens
my eyes.
Now, just what are the practical reasons (if any) for me to keep the
DTD gobbledygook at the top of my XHTML docs right now? A lack of
validators?
(And no, I'm not going to use relative uri-s for any namespaces.)
#####################################################################
Bertilo Wennergren
<http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo>
<bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
#####################################################################
Received on Sunday, 13 August 2000 04:20:17 UTC