- From: Sean Palmer <sean_b_palmer@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 08:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
- Cc: roconnor@uwaterloo.ca, stephanos@webreference.com, DJW@bts.co.uk, connolly@w3.org, cavre@mindspring.com, bertilow@hem.passagen.se, jrexon@newsguy.com
Dear All, I am now pleased to announce the first draft of a document that will (hopefully) clear some of this mess up:- Extending XHTML Using Modularization and Schemas to Good use in Current and Future XHTML/XML Documents at -- http://xhtml.waptechinfo.com/extxhtml.html It's a bit too long to publish here! It's a fairly 'futuristic' document, but then, this is a fairly 'futuristic' arguement, discussing Schemas and Modularization. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO PICK IT TO PIECES AND CRITICIZE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. Any additions that I make through your comments will be credited at the end. I don't think there's much technically wrong though, because it is pretty speculative. It aims to give an introduction to extending XHTML through Modularization and/or Schemas. It does not discuss the mechanics of Schemas too much; but hey, judge for yourselves ;-) In response to the SGML ideas of late, I think this is a neat way of doing it, but then XML is still SGML. SGML architectures are very useful though because you don't have to resort to namespaces, as mentioned before. This means we can have a TRUE comment="" attribute. Many thanks to Russell O'Connor for preparing the SGML arcitectures, and parsing results! Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail – Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2000 11:30:04 UTC