RE: XHTML 1.1 : no frames

> From:	Tantek Celik [SMTP:tantek@cs.stanford.edu]
> 
> unfortunate because it would have been very simple to do (add the "name"
> attribute to the "object" tag, and allow the "target" attribute on "a
> href").
> 
  Because this would have re-introduced one of
the reasons for removing frames, namely that a URL
cannot reflect the full state of a page - e.g. if
a search engine gives you a pointer to the contents
of the object, you will get the object without the 
container when you follow the link; similarly for
personal bookmarks (= IE Favorites).
>  
[DJW:]  
-- 
--------------------------- DISCLAIMER ---------------------------------
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.

Received on Thursday, 31 August 2000 14:21:37 UTC