- From: Bertilo Wennergren <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
- Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 13:15:10 +0200
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
Sean Palmer:
> Namespaces are certainly one way of doing it; however,
> it doesn't seem as if any provisions are being made to
> combine the Schema spec. with the (X)HTML spec. - i.e.
> it doesn't validate on the main XHTML validator.
But such things will work in XHTML 1.1 - I believe.
> Having a util:comment attribute, however, is not the
> same as having a comment attribute, unless the Schema
> was universally recognised. Maybe the W3C should come
> up with a library of Schema for people to use? (Such
> as the one you kindly prepared for us).
All we need is a validator that allows for mixing of vocabularies.
#####################################################################
Bertilo Wennergren
<http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo>
<bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
#####################################################################
Received on Saturday, 12 August 2000 07:14:00 UTC