- From: Jan Roland Eriksson <jrexon@newsguy.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 23:40:38 +0200
- To: "Tantek Celik" <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Cc: Dave J Woolley <DJW@bts.co.uk>, "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 11:51:21 -0700, "Tantek Celik" <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: >From: Dave J Woolley <DJW@bts.co.uk> >Date: Thu, Aug 31, 2000, 11:21 AM > >>> From: Tantek Celik [SMTP:tantek@cs.stanford.edu] >>> >>> unfortunate because it would have been very simple to do (add the "name" >>> attribute to the "object" tag, and allow the "target" attribute on "a >>> href"). >>> >> Because this would have re-introduced one of >> the reasons for removing frames, namely that a URL >> cannot reflect the full state of a page > >Oh, this is WAY too funny. I deliberately snipped the rest of your post Tantek. Welcome back with a serious line of arguments when you are off whatever you have been smoking tonight... (nothing of what you said made sense, so I'l give you a second chance, just because I'm interested in what that might come out like) -- Jan Roland Eriksson <jrexon@newsguy.com> <URL:http://member.newsguy.com/%7Ejrexon/>
Received on Thursday, 31 August 2000 17:40:40 UTC