W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > August 2000

RE: XHTML Invalidity / WML2 / New XHTML 1.1 Attribute

From: Dave J Woolley <DJW@bts.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 11:27:35 +0100
Message-ID: <81E4A2BC03CED111845100104B62AFB582492E@stagecoach.bts.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org
> From:	Cavre [SMTP:cavre@mindspring.com]
> conflicts between the two vocabularies can it or would 
> it be possible instead to use <!-- as a means of incorporating
> another vocabulary within a document.  
If there is any way of achieving this in SGML
(unfortunately the specs are not free, and I don't
have a business need to buy them), it would be
with "<?".  Commented out material does not exist
at all as far as the parser is concerned.  (As
someone else wrote, if the people doing things like
ASP had thought SGML, they would not have used
"<%" etc., but it ought to be well known design 
psychology that people re-invent solutions to
problems with existing solutions because they
don't want to understand the existing ones.
--------------------------- DISCLAIMER ---------------------------------
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.

Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2000 06:27:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 30 April 2020 16:20:40 UTC