w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from January to March 2001 by date

Friday, 30 March 2001

• XML DSIG Typo - Section 6.2 Glenn Adams
• Fwd: W3C Acknowledged Submission: XML Key Management Specification (XKMS) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: XML Encryption Data/Processing Model Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Infoset: In-scope xml:* attributes John Boyer
• RE: XML Encryption Data/Processing Model John Boyer

Thursday, 29 March 2001

• RFC 3076 on Canonical XML RFC Editor

Wednesday, 28 March 2001

• RFC 3075 on XML-Signature Syntax and Processing RFC Editor

Friday, 30 March 2001

• Infoset: In-scope xml:* attributes TAMURA Kent
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema TAMURA Kent
• Re: XML Encryption Data/Processing Model Hiroshi Maruyama

Thursday, 29 March 2001

• Re: Latest version of the Infoset Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Latest version of the Infoset Martin Duerst
• RE: Latest version of the Infoset Martin Duerst

Wednesday, 28 March 2001

• RE: Latest version of the Infoset John Boyer
• Re: Latest version of the Infoset Martin Duerst
• RE: Latest version of the Infoset John Boyer
• Re: Latest version of the Infoset Arnaud Le Hors
• RE: Latest version of the Infoset John Boyer
• Re: Latest version of the Infoset Philippe Le Hegaret
• RE: Latest version of the Infoset John Boyer
• Re: X509SKI Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: XML DSIG Questions Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema Glenn Adams
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema Tom Gindin
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema Glenn Adams
• X509SKI Glenn Adams
• X509IssuerSerial Glenn Adams
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Latest version of the Infoset Philippe Le Hegaret

Tuesday, 27 March 2001

• RE: What to do with CryptoBinary? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Question to C14N Implementors abou Validation Rob Lugt
• Question to C14N Implementors abou Validation Christian Geuer-Pollmann
• RE: What to do with CryptoBinary? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: What to do with CryptoBinary? Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• RE: What to do with CryptoBinary? Brian LaMacchia

Monday, 26 March 2001

• Re: What to do with CryptoBinary? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: What to do with CryptoBinary? Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• What to do with CryptoBinary? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: XML DSIG Questions Glenn Adams
• External Attributes in Signature Elements Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: XML DSIG Questions Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Friday, 23 March 2001

• Re: interoperability efforts? merlin

Thursday, 22 March 2001

• Re: interoperability efforts? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Wednesday, 21 March 2001

• RE: [ANN] W3C SOAP Digital Signature Jacek Kopecky
• XENC use of ds:KeyInfo Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Tuesday, 20 March 2001

• Re: AW: KeyInfo (Was: Urgent: W3C Guidlines on Namespace structure) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Monday, 19 March 2001

• Fwd: Canonical XML Version 1.0 Becomes a W3C Recommendation Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Friday, 16 March 2001

• RE: Draft Comments on InfoSet John Boyer
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema Thomas Maslen

Thursday, 15 March 2001

• AW: KeyInfo (Was: Urgent: W3C Guidlines on Namespace structure) Gregor Karlinger
• RE: Draft Comments on InfoSet John Boyer

Wednesday, 14 March 2001

• Re: X509SerialNumber schema Ken Goldman
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: XPath and Signature ? Christian Geuer-Pollmann

Tuesday, 13 March 2001

• RE: XPath and Signature ? John Boyer
• AW: <Q> Does a signature XML Document need to be a valid XML document ? Peter Lipp
• Re: KeyInfo: sequence or choice merlin
• Re: interoperability efforts? merlin

Monday, 12 March 2001

• Re: X509SerialNumber schema Ken Goldman
• Re: XPath and Signature ? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: X509SerialNumber schema Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• XPath and Signature ? Christian Geuer-Pollmann

Friday, 9 March 2001

• X509SerialNumber schema Ken Goldman

Thursday, 8 March 2001

• Re: interoperability efforts? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: <Q> Does a signature XML Document need to be a valid XML document ? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• interoperability efforts? Hans Granqvist
• <Q> Does a signature XML Document need to be a valid XML document ? XML DSig
• Re: <Q> Is there a business situation to illustrate this ? Ken Goldman
• Re: <Q> Is there a business situation to illustrate this ? Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: <Q> XMLDSig and forms... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• <Q> XMLDSig and forms... XML DSig
• <Q> Is there a business situation to illustrate this ? XML DSig

Wednesday, 7 March 2001

• Closing Multiple KeyValue Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• KeyInfo: sequence or choice Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: empty KeyInfo, etc. Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Monday, 5 March 2001

• empty KeyInfo, etc. merlin

Friday, 2 March 2001

• Re: XML-signature & Canonical XML implementations? Christian Geuer-Pollmann
• XML-signature & Canonical XML implementations? Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com

Tuesday, 27 February 2001

• Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Saturday, 24 February 2001

• RE: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Thursday, 22 February 2001

• xmldsig Charmod Comments Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• xmldsig Infoset Comments Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Carl Ellison
• Re: AW: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Carl Wallace
• RE: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Blair Dillaway
• RE: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Brian LaMacchia
• RE: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Blair Dillaway

Wednesday, 21 February 2001

• Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: AW: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Carl Ellison
• AW: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Gregor Karlinger
• Re: Draft Comments on Charmod Last Call Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? TAMURA Kent

Tuesday, 20 February 2001

• Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Specifications' Status and Tweaked Schema Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Sunday, 18 February 2001

• RE: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Brian LaMacchia

Friday, 16 February 2001

• Re: Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Carl Wallace
• Poll: Limiting KeyValue to a single Instance? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Thursday, 15 February 2001

• Draft Comments on InfoSet Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Draft Comments on Charmod Last Call Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Wednesday, 14 February 2001

• Re: The X509Data Element clarification... Tom Gindin
• Re: The X509Data Element clarification... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Tuesday, 13 February 2001

• Re: The X509Data Element clarification... Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• XKMS Interest Group / Informal BOF 1st March, Cambridge MA Philip Hallam-Baker
• FYI: Call for Implementation: XML Fragment Interchange Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: The X509Data Element clarification... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: The X509Data Element clarification... Rich Salz
• The X509Data Element clarification... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Monday, 12 February 2001

• Re: RetrievalMethod type question (KeyValue) Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: What is the appropriate way to interpret URI's in the XML signed document. Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• What is the appropriate way to interpret URI's in the XML signed document. XML DSig

Friday, 9 February 2001

• RetrievalMethod type question (2nd ping) Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Wednesday, 7 February 2001

• RetrievalMethod type question Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Tuesday, 6 February 2001

• RE: DSA cracked?? or wired wrong?? L. Sassaman
• Re: DSA cracked?? or wired wrong?? Yongge Wang
• RE: DSA cracked?? or wired wrong?? John Boyer
• Re: DSA cracked?? or wired wrong?? Christian Geuer-Pollmann
• DSA cracked?? or wired wrong?? Philip Hallam-Baker

Friday, 2 February 2001

• Re: RetrievalMethod Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Document Action: Canonical XML Version 1.0 to Informational The IESG
• IPR Disclosure Brachi, Nigel
• Volunteers for Infoset Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• KeyInfo Extensibility poll results Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: RetrievalMethod TAMURA Kent

Tuesday, 30 January 2001

• Re: Multiple IssuerSerial/SubjectName/SKI in an X509Data Tom Gindin
• Re: RetrievalMethod Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: KeyInfo Extensibility poll Carl Wallace
• Re: RetrievalMethod TAMURA Kent
• RE: KeyInfo Extensibility poll Brian LaMacchia
• RE: KeyInfo Extensibility poll Brian LaMacchia
• Re: KeyInfo Extensibility poll Carl Wallace

Monday, 29 January 2001

• Volunteers for CharModel Review Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: RetrievalMethod Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Sunday, 28 January 2001

• RE: KeyInfo Extensibility poll Brian LaMacchia

Monday, 29 January 2001

• RE: KeyInfo Extensibility poll Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Does Shana patent 6,028,938 impact XForms? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: RetrievalMethod TAMURA Kent
• Comments for PR-xml-c14n-20010119 Susan Lesch

Sunday, 28 January 2001

• Re: KeyInfo Extensibility poll Carl Wallace

Thursday, 25 January 2001

• RE: KeyInfo Extensibility poll Brian LaMacchia

Friday, 26 January 2001

• Does Shana patent 6,028,938 impact XForms? Micah Dubinko
• Re: RetrievalMethod Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RetrievalMethod TAMURA Kent
• Multiple KeyValue TAMURA Kent
• Re: Multiple IssuerSerial/SubjectName/SKI in an X509Data TAMURA Kent

Thursday, 25 January 2001

• Re: Multiple IssuerSerial/SubjectName/SKI in an X509Data Carl Wallace
• Re: Multiple IssuerSerial/SubjectName/SKI in an X509Data Rich Salz
• Multiple IssuerSerial/SubjectName/SKI in an X509Data TAMURA Kent
• AW: AW: KeyInfo Extensibility poll Gregor Karlinger
• Re: KeyInfo Extensibility poll Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Wednesday, 24 January 2001

• Re: AW: KeyInfo Extensibility poll merlin
• AW: KeyInfo Extensibility poll Gregor Karlinger
• Re: KeyInfo Extensibility poll Carl Wallace
• AW: KeyInfo Extensibility poll Gregor Karlinger
• Re: KeyInfo Extensibility poll merlin
• AW: KeyInfo Extensibility poll Gregor Karlinger

Tuesday, 23 January 2001

• KeyInfo Extensibility poll Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Monday, 22 January 2001

• Re: XML validation clarification? Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: additional XML Digital Signature clarifications Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• CRL like extensions Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Sunday, 21 January 2001

• signature validation clarification fjh@alum.mit.edu

Monday, 22 January 2001

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-canonical-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Sunday, 21 January 2001

• XML validation clarification? Frederick J. Hirsch
• additional XML Digital Signature clarifications Frederick J. Hirsch

Friday, 19 January 2001

• C14N Proposed REC Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: The changing DSIG name space Petteri Stenius
• Re: The changing DSIG name space Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: The changing DSIG name space Rich Salz
• Re: The changing DSIG name space Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: The changing DSIG name space Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: The changing DSIG name space Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Thursday, 18 January 2001

• The changing DSIG name space Ken Goldman
• Re: Moving a Thread to the List: KeyInfo Extensibility Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• FYI: Updated Signature Example Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Wednesday, 17 January 2001

• Re: Moving a Thread to the List: KeyInfo Extensibility merlin
• Re: KeyInfo Rich Salz

Tuesday, 16 January 2001

• RE: KeyInfo Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Monday, 15 January 2001

• RE: KeyInfo Brian LaMacchia

Tuesday, 16 January 2001

• Moving a Thread to the List: KeyInfo Extensibility Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: KeyInfo Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Wednesday, 10 January 2001

• Re: Problem with canonical form? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Tuesday, 9 January 2001

• Re: Problem with canonical form? Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Problem with canonical form? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Monday, 8 January 2001

• Re: Problem with canonical form? Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Problem with canonical form? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Problem with canonical form? Joseph Ashwood
• RE: The name space URI Philip Hallam-Baker
• Re: The name space URI Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• The name space URI Philip Hallam-Baker
• RE: Problem with canonical form? Philip Hallam-Baker

Saturday, 6 January 2001

• Re: Problem with canonical form? Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Problem with canonical form? Al Gilman
• Re: Problem with canonical form? Martin J. Duerst

Friday, 5 January 2001

• Re: Problem with canonical form? Rich Salz
• Problem with canonical form? Joseph Ashwood

Wednesday, 3 January 2001

• FYI: SignatureProperty and Signature Semantics Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2001 19:48:02 UTC