- From: Glenn Adams <gadams@vgi.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 12:18:38 -0500
- To: "Tom Gindin" <tgindin@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <kgold@watson.ibm.com>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Yes, I just looked at a variety of VeriSign certificates, and they all seem to use 128-bit serial numbers. I'm beginning to believe Ken has a good suggestion regardring the use of ds:CrytoBinary rather than Integer as the type for X509SerialNumber. Regards, Glenn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Gindin" <tgindin@us.ibm.com> To: "Glenn Adams" <gadams@vgi.com> Cc: <kgold@watson.ibm.com>; <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 12:11 PM Subject: Re: X509SerialNumber schema > > AFAIK there is at least one commercial CA vendor who > CHARACTERISTICALLY produces 128-bit or longer serial numbers with values > which do not appear to be sequentially assigned. If you have an installed > copy of Netscape's browser, and look at the Class 3 Public Primary > Certification Authority from Verisign, you'll see a 128-bit serial number > starting with hex 7D. I can only speculate how these numbers were actually > assigned - if you're interested you can ask somebody who really knows. > I can't see any 160-bit values, and you can take that part of what I > told Ken as my vague and unreliable recollection. > > Tom Gindin > > > "Glenn Adams" <gadams@vgi.com>@w3.org on 03/28/2001 11:18:16 AM > > Sent by: w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org > > > To: <kgold@watson.ibm.com> > cc: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org> > Subject: Re: X509SerialNumber schema > > > > > Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 15:30:22 -0500 > > Message-Id: <200103092030.PAA35236@alpha.watson.ibm.com> > > From: Ken Goldman <kgold@watson.ibm.com> > > To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > > Subject: X509SerialNumber schema > > ... > > > Assuming that (1) is right - If I have an X509SerialNumber from a > > certificate that is a long string of bits (Tom Ginden mentioned back on > > July that some certificates use a hash value of 160 bits) doesn't the > > binary to decimal conversion become computationally painful. > > Are you certain this hash is used for CertificateSerialNumber as opposed to > using it for > SubjectKeyIdentifier? RFC2459 Section 4.2.1.2 describes such a hash to be > used > for SubectKeyIdentifier. > > Regards, > Glenn Adams > > >
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2001 12:19:55 UTC