- From: XML DSig <xmldsig@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 15:45:34 +0530
- To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Hi: In section 3.4 of the XML-Signature requirements document titled "Coordination" it is mentioned 1. The XML Signature specification SHOULD meet the requirements of the following applications: 3. At least one forms application [XFA,XFDL] As far as I understand neither XFA nor XFDL are W3C recommendations. In addition the forms vendors in this space iLumin, PureEdge, JetForms have NOT made any explicit and specific statements about their support for XMLDigital Signature CR on their websites / product brochures. So why should the XML signature requirements make statements such as the one above. What is the XML Digital Signature WG's view point about the XForms 1.0 cf. http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/ ? Why is XForms (which is a W3C WD) not a SHOULD be supported in the XML Signature requirements document ? Thanks for your time. best regards XMLDSig Dev. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2001 05:16:06 UTC