- From: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:27:24 +0900
- To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
In message "Re: X509SerialNumber schema"
on 01/03/28, "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com> writes:
> Given that there are a number of interoperable implementations and
> none of the implementors seem to want to change, the specification
> should stay the same but I do have some responses to your comments.
Right. I don't want to change our implementation and this
change might cause performance penalty on Java because Java
treats serial numbers as BigInteger instance.
--
TAMURA Kent as a developer of IBM XML Security Suite
Received on Friday, 30 March 2001 04:27:59 UTC