W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: The X509Data Element clarification...

From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <lde008@dma.isg.mot.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:51:29 -0500
Message-Id: <200102131551.KAA22833@noah.dma.isg.mot.com>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@caveosystems.com>
cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, lde008@dma.isg.mot.com

From:  Rich Salz <rsalz@caveosystems.com>
Message-ID:  <3A88A8F9.F77FA4D6@caveosystems.com>
Date:  Mon, 12 Feb 2001 22:24:41 -0500
To:  "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
CC:  w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, lde008@dma.isg.mot.com
References:  <200102130257.VAA0000003674@torque.pothole.com>

>> All X509IssuerSerial, X509SKI, and X509SubjectName elements must refer
>> to certficiates with the validation key.  However, because you can
>> have multiple cetificates for the same key in the same X509Data
>> element, there may be multiple such elements referring to different
>> certificates or, of course, the same element.
>I assume you mean "certificate" for that last word.


>Also, what about something like "No ordering is implied."

Sounds reasonable.

>	/r$

Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2001 10:51:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:10:04 UTC