- From: John Boyer <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:27:01 -0800
- To: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Hi Philippe, Actually, the status of the document says it is the 'about to become CR' working draft that has been created to address the concerns raised in last call. There is no indication that another last call will occur before infoset becomes a CR. Thus, it would be helpful to know what aspect of last call feedback caused the editors to remove entity ref and cdata markers. Thanks, John Boyer Senior Product Architect, Software Development Internet Commerce System (ICS) Team PureEdge Solutions Inc. Trusted Digital Relationships v: 250-708-8047 f: 250-708-8010 1-888-517-2675 http://www.PureEdge.com <http://www.pureedge.com/> > Editors: Is there some reason why entity ref (and cdata) markers got > yanked? I can understand tweaking features in response to a last call, > but it seems uncommon to make such a substantive change without issuing > another last call. The document is back to working draft so there will be an other last call in the future. Philippe
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2001 16:27:35 UTC