- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 07:54:30 +0900
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, John Boyer <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>
- Cc: www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Hello Philippe, John, It is not true in general, and it is not true in particular for the Infoset, that going back to working draft means that there is another last call. An additional working draft is often used to confirm last call resolutions just before going to CR. For details, please see http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/#status. Regards, Martin. At 16:21 01/03/28 -0500, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: >John Boyer wrote: > > Editors: Is there some reason why entity ref (and cdata) markers got > > yanked? I can understand tweaking features in response to a last call, > > but it seems uncommon to make such a substantive change without issuing > > another last call. > >The document is back to working draft so there will be an other last call >in the future.
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2001 17:55:52 UTC