- From: Carl Ellison <cme@acm.org>
- Date: 22 Feb 2001 07:10:54 -0800
- To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
- Cc: "Carl Ellison" <cme@acm.org>, "TAMURA Kent" <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, kent@trl.ibm.co.jp, bal@microsoft.com, cwallace@erols.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At 06:50 PM 2/21/01 -0500, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. wrote: >Carl: I'm not sure if you argument is for multiple elements in general >(which is already permitted), or the possibility of multiple KeyValues >(which we are discussing, and I thought you previously opposed)? I imagine having to support multiple formats of certificate in the chain backing up one verification key. I can also imagine having multiple chains backing a single key, of the same or different formats. I am not enough of an XML expert to say which schema modifications (if any are needed at all) achieve that result the best. I was hoping to leave that to the real experts on this list. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.2 iQA/AwUBOpUr/XPxfjyW5ytxEQLNnACeME9QDWiVoEvyY1WUXeFja86Ox+wAnivv tV3D5FEtBnTf1Ry8Ig0/M89g =qecu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Carl M. Ellison cme@acm.org http://world.std.com/~cme | | PGP: 08FF BA05 599B 49D2 23C6 6FFD 36BA D342 | +--Officer, officer, arrest that man. He's whistling a dirty song.-+
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2001 10:11:18 UTC