public-ws-addressing@w3.org from February 2006 by author

Abbie Barbir

• RE: Encrytping WS-A headers (Friday, 24 February)

Anish Karmarkar

• Re: Clarification for WS-RX (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Was resolution of CR4 nullified by resolution of CR15? (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal (Thursday, 16 February)
• CR 20: amalgamated proposal (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Was resolution of CR4 nullified by resolution of CR15? (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: CR20: proposal 4a (crisper version) (Monday, 13 February)
• CR20: proposal 4a (crisper version) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Why we shouldn't make [destination] optional (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: WSA From (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: CR20 (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Wednesday, 1 February)

Arun Gupta

• Encrytping WS-A headers (Thursday, 23 February)

Bob Freund-Hitachi

• Dreaft Agenda, WS-A f2f Mar 2-3 2006 (Thursday, 23 February)
• Draft Minutes 2006-02-20 distributed meeting (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Agenda, WS-Addressing distributed meeting 2006-02-20 16:00 eastern (Monday, 20 February)
• Transition announcement, WS-Addressing 1.0 WSDL Binding to Last Call Working Draft (Friday, 17 February)
• WS-Addressing, minutes of the 2006-02-13 distributed meeting (Tuesday, 14 February)
• WS-Addressing: Agenda, 2006-02-13 distributed meeting (Sunday, 12 February)
• Minutes of the February 6 ws-Addressing meeting are ready for review (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Agenda: WS-A telecon Feb 6 2006 (Friday, 3 February)
• Minutes of Jan 20 meeting are ready for review (Thursday, 2 February)

Cahill, Conor P

• RE: WSA From (Saturday, 11 February)
• RE: WSA From (Wednesday, 8 February)

Christopher B Ferris

• Re: Clarification for WS-RX (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Clarification for WS-RX (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: Clarification for WS-RX (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Clarification for WS-RX (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Clarification for WS-RX (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: WSA From (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Clarification on MessageId (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: Clarification on MessageId (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Wednesday, 1 February)

Conor P. Cahill

• RE: WSA From (Wednesday, 8 February)

Davanum Srinivas

• Typo in latest Editor's draft (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Clarification on MessageId (Tuesday, 7 February)

David Hull

• Re: Draft Minutes 2006-02-20 distributed meeting (Thursday, 23 February)
• CR 23 omnibus (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Clarification for WS-RX (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Clarification for WS-RX (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Action item for cr23: cr15 resolution nullified cr4 resolution: proposed text (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Clarification for WS-RX (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Text for "except as a consequence of section 3.4" (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Clarification for WS-RX (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Clarification for WS-RX (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Was resolution of CR4 nullified by resolution of CR15? (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: Was resolution of CR4 nullified by resolution of CR15? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: CR20 proposal (consistent wording) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: CR20 proposal (consistent wording) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: CR20 proposal (consistent wording) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: CR20: proposal 4a (crisper version) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: CR20 proposal (consistent wording) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: CR20 proposal (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: WSA From (Saturday, 11 February)
• Preferences for CR 20 (Friday, 10 February)
• Preferences for CR 18 (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Choices for CR 20 (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Proposed text for CR18 (Thursday, 9 February)
• Why we shouldn't make [destination] optional (Thursday, 9 February)
• CR 18 options, CR 20 options and chad (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Choices for CR 20 (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Choices for CR 18 (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: CR20 (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: CR20 (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: CR 18: Proposal (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases (Thursday, 2 February)
• (possible) WS-RX use cases (Thursday, 2 February)
• one-way over request-response over one-way over ... (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: XMLP telcon agenda, 1 Feb 2006 (Wednesday, 1 February)

David Illsley

• Re: Contradiction in WSDL Binding (Tuesday, 21 February)

David Orchard

• RE: Clarification for WS-RX (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. (Tuesday, 14 February)
• RE: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. (Monday, 13 February)
• Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: WSA From (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Thursday, 2 February)

Doug Davis

• Re: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: WSA From (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: WSA From (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: WSA From (Thursday, 9 February)

Eran Chinthaka

• Testing Call (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Clarification on MessageId (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Clarification on MessageId (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Clarification on MessageId (Tuesday, 7 February)

Francisco Curbera

• Regrets for today's teleconference (Monday, 20 February)
• RE: CR 20: amalgamated proposal (Friday, 17 February)
• RE: CR 20: amalgamated proposal (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: CR20 proposal (consistent wording) (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: WSA From (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: WSA From (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: CR20 proposal (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: WSA From (Sunday, 12 February)
• CR20 proposal (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: Proposed text for CR18 (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: CR20 (Tuesday, 7 February)
• CR20 (Monday, 6 February)

Glen Daniels

• RE: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Friday, 3 February)

Hugo Haas

• Re: Contradiction in WSDL Binding (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: WS-Addressing, minutes of the 2006-02-13 distributed meeting (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal (Friday, 17 February)

John Kemp

• Re: WSA From (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: WSA From (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: WSA From (Thursday, 9 February)

Jonathan Marsh

• WS-Desc comments on WS-A WSDL Binding LC (Tuesday, 28 February)
• RE: Testing result update (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Testing result update (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: CR 20: amalgamated proposal (Thursday, 16 February)
• RE: CR 20: amalgamated proposal (Thursday, 16 February)
• RE: CR20: proposal 4a (crisper version) (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: CR20 proposal (consistent wording) (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: New Issue: Strengthen guidance on protocol-specifc fault action values (Saturday, 11 February)
• New Issue: Strengthen guidance on protocol-specifc fault action values (Monday, 6 February)

Katy Warr

• Action item for cr23: cr15 resolution nullified cr4 resolution: UPDATED proposed text (Monday, 27 February)
• Action item for cr23: cr15 resolution nullified cr4 resolution: proposed text (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Minor editorial points to WSDL spec (Tuesday, 14 February)

Marc Hadley

• Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Minor editorial points to WSDL spec (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Wednesday, 1 February)

Mark Baker

• Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: CR20 proposal (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: WSA From (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: Choices for CR 20 (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Choices for CR 20 (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: WSA From (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Thursday, 2 February)

Mark Little

• Re: WSA From (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: WSA From (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: WSA From (Wednesday, 8 February)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: WSA From (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: WSA From (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: New Issue: Strengthen guidance on protocol-specifc fault action values (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: WSA From (Thursday, 9 February)

Michael McIntosh

• Re: Encrytping WS-A headers (Thursday, 23 February)

Mike Vernal

• Regrets for Next Three Calls (2/6, 2/13, 2/20) (Monday, 6 February)

Paul Fremantle

• Re: WSA From (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: WSA From (Wednesday, 8 February)
• WSA From (Tuesday, 7 February)

paul.downey@bt.com

• RE: Clarification for WS-RX (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: WS-Addressing, minutes of the 2006-02-13 distributed meeting (Friday, 17 February)
• RE: Proposed text for CR18 (Monday, 13 February)
• Proposed text for CR18 (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: Clarification on MessageId (Tuesday, 7 February)
• RE: (possible) WS-RX use cases (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: (possible) WS-RX use cases (Thursday, 2 February)

Prasad Yendluri

• Re: Clarification on MessageId (Tuesday, 7 February)

Rich Salz

• Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc (Wednesday, 1 February)

Rogers, Tony

• RE: Clarification for WS-RX (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Contradiction in WSDL Binding (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: CR 20: amalgamated proposal (Friday, 17 February)
• RE: CR 20: amalgamated proposal (Friday, 17 February)
• RE: Clarification on MessageId (Tuesday, 7 February)

Tom Rutt

• Re: WSA From (Wednesday, 8 February)

Vikas Deolaliker

• RE: Encrytping WS-A headers (Friday, 24 February)

Waris, Faisal \(F.\)

• Fw: Removal of Source Endpoint (wsa:From) - Feedback (Friday, 3 February)

Yalcinalp, Umit

• RE: Clarification for WS-RX (Thursday, 23 February)
• RE: Clarification for WS-RX (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. (Thursday, 16 February)
• RE: Was resolution of CR4 nullified by resolution of CR15? (Tuesday, 14 February)

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 February 2006 11:14:09 UTC