- From: Davanum Srinivas <dims@wso2.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:30:21 -0500
- To: pyendluri@webmethods.com
- CC: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>, paul.downey@bt.com, chinthaka@wso2.com, public-ws-addressing@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org, Tony.Rogers@ca.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hehehe, yes, that was a typo. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=113825268327180&w=2 thanks, dims Prasad Yendluri wrote: > True. BTW, the scheme and namespace must occur in that order like > _urn:uuid:<aUniqueNumber>_ > Eran's note shows them reversed "_uuid:urn:<aUniqueNumber>_". I hope > that was a typo. > > > Christopher B Ferris wrote: >> >> Exactly, >> >> You need to use both prefixes. One is the scheme (urn:) and the other >> is the >> urn: namespace id (uuid) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Christopher Ferris >> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture >> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com >> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440 >> phone: +1 508 377 9295 >> >> public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org wrote on 02/07/2006 02:12:53 AM: >> >> > >> > >> > > I would have thought that one might use EITHER uuid: OR urn: as a >> > > prefix to the message id - using both seems a little excessive. >> > >> > > Perhaps one of our MS representatives might care to comment? >> > >> > or prehaps anyone with the wits to read RFC4122 ;-) >> > >> > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4122.txt >> > >> > Paul >> > - -- Davanum Srinivas (dims@wso2.com) VP/Engg, WSO2 (http://wso2.com) Yahoo IM: dims Cell/Mobile: +1 (508) 415 7509 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin) iD8DBQFD6RFsDQylxigoT5kRAiczAJ9Lh1XkfrXGQvu9w5IUMYlqvudE0QCgnxhV EjnPlf37DHivV29LH5Wh1lI= =eYgp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2006 21:32:41 UTC