Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal

Yes.
That is what we meant to say.
Your wordings are much better. Thx.

-Anish
--

Marc Hadley wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> 
>>
>> {The next 2 paras below are new}
>> Messages on such a channel must have a [destination] property value of
>> "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous". Additionally,  this is
>> the default value of such responses if the [destination] value is not
>> specified.
>>
> Shouldn't that last sentence read: "Additionally this is the default  
> value of [destination] in such responses if wsa:To is omitted" ? I.e.  
> you need to introduce the syntactic default that allows you to omit  
> wsa:To even though [destination] has a required value.
> 
> Marc.
> 
>> Outside of this usage, this specification assigns no particular
>> semantics to the use of "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/ anonymous"
>> for the [destination] property in this binding.
>>
>>
>> -Paco & Anish
>> -- 
>>
>>
>>
> 
> ---
> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
> Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 16 February 2006 23:42:21 UTC