Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding.

No sure what you meant by 'SOAP Envelope or SOAP Body'.
If we say 'SOAP Envelope' that would cover SOAP Body, SOAP header 
block(s) or both. Unless you explicitly wanted to prevent a SOAP Body.

-Anish
--

David Orchard wrote:
> Well, I had meant to say SOAP body, to point out that it might be just
> header blocks coming back..  Perhaps I should say "SOAP Envelope or SOAP
> Body"...
> 
> I agree with the 2nd ed comment :-)
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com]
>>Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:55 PM
>>To: David Orchard
>>Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
>>Subject: Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP
>>Binding.
>>
>>2 editorial (I hope) comments below.
>>
>>-Anish
>>--
>>
>>David Orchard wrote:
>>
>>>I had an action to wordsmith the new binding around "response".  My
> 
> best
> 
>>>attempt is:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>This SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP binding, in conjunction
>>>with the SOAP 1.1 binding, can be used for sending request messages
> 
> with
> 
>>>an optional SOAP response.  This binding augments the SOAP 1.1
> 
> binding
> 
>>>by allowing that the HTTP [RFC 2616] response MAY have a 202 status
> 
> code
> 
>>>and the response body MAY be empty.  Note that the HTTP [RFC 2616]
>>>specification states "the 202 response is intentionally
> 
> non-committal".
> 
>>>As such, any content in the response body, including a SOAP body,
> 
> MAY or
> 
>>s/SOAP body/SOAP Envelope/
>>
>>
>>>MAY not be an expected SOAP response.
>>
>>s/MAY not/MAY NOT/
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Old text:
>>>
>>>This SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP binding can be used for
>>>sending request messages with an optional response. For such
> 
> messages,
> 
>>>the HTTP [RFC 2616]
>>>
>>
> <file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\dorchard\Local%20Settings\Tempora
> ry
> 
> %20Internet%20Files\OLK6\soap11reqoptresphttpbinding.html#RFC2616#RFC261
> 6>
> 
>>>response MUST be a 202 status code and the response body MAY be
> 
> empty.
> 
>>>
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>
>>>Dave
>>>
> 
>

Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 21:23:00 UTC