- From: Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:54:47 -0500
- To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
This is my summary of the options I think we have to close CR20. 0. Get rid of the defaulting altogether. I don;t think anyone is pushing for this option anymore. 1. Restrict the defaulting of To to the anonymous URI to response messages only. This is fully consistent with the resolution of CR17, that restricts the defaulting of ReplyTo (to the "anonymous EPR") to request messages. Advantages: consistent approach to the use of defaults for optimizing the synch request response patter, but leaving other potential issues unmodified. 2. Ban the use of anonymous in the To field altogether. Disadvantage: does not take into account the fact that anonymous has different meanings depending of the transport. 3. Middle of the road approach: retain the defaulting of the To header to anonymous, but re-state that its use is actually dependent on the interpretation that the transport binding gives to the anonymous URI. Add a note indicating that for the SOAP/HTTP case the anonymous URI is only used to indicate the use of the HTTP back channel so it can only be used in reply messages. I think #3 provides an answer to CR 18 as well. Paco
Received on Monday, 6 February 2006 18:55:10 UTC