Agenda, WS-Addressing distributed meeting 2006-02-20 16:00 eastern

W3C Web Services Addressing Working Group - distributed meeting agenda

  Monday, 20 Feb

  21:00-23:00 UTC; 13:00-15:00 US/Pacific; 16:00-18:00 US/Eastern;
21:00-23:00 UK/London; 22:00-24:00 FR/Paris; 7:00-9:00 (Tuesday)
AU/Brisbane; 8:00-10:00 (Tuesday) AU/Melbourne

 

  Dial-in information on WG Admin page
<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/admin>

 

1. Roll call, select scribe

(see scribe list below)

 

2. Agenda review, AOB

 

3. Call for corrections to the minutes

  - 2006-02-03:
<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/6/02/13-ws-addr-minutes.html>

 

4. Review action items
<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/admin#actionitems>

    2006-01-19: David Orchard to draft SOAP 1.1 one-way binding WG Note.
DONE

    2006-02-06: cr20 - Anish Karmarkar to Work with Paco to propose a
consolidated proposal  DONE

    2006-02-03:  to insert an editorial note linking to the SOAP 1.1
proposal  PENDING

 

5. Proposed and New Issues

* cr21 - Resolution of CR17 introduced contradiction

 

* cr22 - Strengthen guidance on protocol-specifc fault action values

  Proposal 1: 

         change the above text as follows:

         

         SOAP modules and extensions SHOULD define custom [action]
values for the

            faults they describe but MAY designate use of the following
[action]

            value instead:

      

* cr23 - cr15 resolution nullified cr4 resolution

 

6. Issues <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/cr-issues/>

  

* cr18 - Precise meaning of an anonymous destination in a request
message

  Proposal 1:
<http://www.w3.org/mid/OF1F57D08F.9FF5FBE5-ON8525710C.00770973-8525710D.
0067E532@us.ibm.com>

  Proposal 2: <http://www.w3.org/mid/43EA1FC7.1090806@tibco.com>

  Proposal 3: Clarify Status
Quo<http://www.w3.org/mid/2A7793353757DB4392DF4DFBBC9522550276F310@I2KM1
1-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>

  

* cr20 - Default value of To property

  ACTION: 2006-02-06: Anish Karmarkar to Work with Paco to propose a
consolidated proposal  DONE

  Proposal 1:
<http://www.w3.org/mid/OF1F57D08F.9FF5FBE5-ON8525710C.00770973-8525710D.
0067E532@us.ibm.com>

  Proposal 2: <http://www.w3.org/mid/43F4CC10.4020507@oracle.com>

  Proposal 3:
<http://www.w3.org/mid/37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E801A188EB@RED-MSG-
10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

  

7. Issues <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/lc-issues/>

  

* lc109 - Should [fault endpoint] be required for robust in-only
message? 

* lc110 - Should [fault endpoint] be prohibited in Robust in-only fault
messages?X. Other Business

 

-----------------------------------------------------------

Scribe list

 

A participant from the Member at the top of the list is expected to
scribe the meeting. If no participant from that Member is able to
scribe, a participant from the the next Member on the list is expected
to scribe, and so forth. After one participant from a Member scribes,
that Member's name goes to the bottom of the list.

 

Systinet

Sonoa

Hitachi

HP

IBM

Oracle

ERICSSON

IONA

Nortel

Sun

Microsoft

webMethods

WSO2

JBoss

Fujitsu

TIBCO

Sonic

W3C

SAP

BT

BEA

CA

 

 

See <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/minutes.html> for more information
about taking minutes.