- From: Eran Chinthaka <chinthaka@wso2.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:31:00 +0600
- To: "[WS-A]" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I've started to complete WS-A implementation we have with Axis2. When I went through our issue tracking system, I saw a little confusing issue being filled by a user who was trying to interoperate .net with Axis2. He has complained saying .net expects message id of the pattern "uuid:urn:<aUniqueNumber>". But the spec says it can be any IRI. But for me it seems that .net has mandated to prefix the uuid with "uuid:urn". I checked with WS-A CR here : http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/CR-ws-addr-core-20050817/ (BTW, this is the latest, right ? ). In the first example, the message id was like http://example.com/6B29FC40-CA47-1067-B31D-00DD010662DA. So as far as the interop is concerned what do you think about this ? Shall we adhere to the practice of putting "uuid:urn:<aUniqueNumber>" as the message id, or will it be "any" IRI ? ( Please forgive me, if the one who has filled the bug has lied, as I couldn't try this on my own :( ) Thanks, Eran Chinthaka -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) iD8DBQFD6CKEjON2uBzUhh8RAtmcAJ97gURq5xAu+09IC6Gehp/EdA/pTQCdHPAR E7dyI6RMvVsoJhRhMuuZubs= =XLQX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2006 04:31:14 UTC