RE: (possible) WS-RX use cases from paul.downey@bt.com on 2006-02-06 (public-ws-addressing@w3.org from February 2006)

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:28:39 -0000
To: <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, <dmh@tibco.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2A7793353757DB4392DF4DFBBC9522550276F2F8@I2KM11-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>

and this is using HTTP "POST" and not some new "TUNNEL" 
or "CHANNEL" verb, right?

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org on behalf of Anish Karmarkar
Sent: Mon 2/6/2006 9:04 PM
To: David Hull
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subject: Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases

There is also another case:

   * I send you a message.
   * You don't ack it immediately, but instead just send an empty 202.
   * I send you another message
   * You send me WS-RX acks for the previous message. But the ack header 
does not acknowledge the current message.

-Anish
--

Received on Monday, 6 February 2006 22:31:57 UTC