- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:27:31 -0800
- To: "Anish Karmarkar" <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
I want to allow it all. SOAP envelope with or without soap body, no soap envelope. Some people had been talking about the "case of the envelope missing a body", so I wanted to highlight that.. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:23 PM > To: David Orchard > Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org > Subject: Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP > Binding. > > No sure what you meant by 'SOAP Envelope or SOAP Body'. > If we say 'SOAP Envelope' that would cover SOAP Body, SOAP header > block(s) or both. Unless you explicitly wanted to prevent a SOAP Body. > > -Anish > -- > > David Orchard wrote: > > Well, I had meant to say SOAP body, to point out that it might be just > > header blocks coming back.. Perhaps I should say "SOAP Envelope or SOAP > > Body"... > > > > I agree with the 2nd ed comment :-) > > > > Dave > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] > >>Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:55 PM > >>To: David Orchard > >>Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org > >>Subject: Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP > >>Binding. > >> > >>2 editorial (I hope) comments below. > >> > >>-Anish > >>-- > >> > >>David Orchard wrote: > >> > >>>I had an action to wordsmith the new binding around "response". My > > > > best > > > >>>attempt is: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>This SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP binding, in conjunction > >>>with the SOAP 1.1 binding, can be used for sending request messages > > > > with > > > >>>an optional SOAP response. This binding augments the SOAP 1.1 > > > > binding > > > >>>by allowing that the HTTP [RFC 2616] response MAY have a 202 status > > > > code > > > >>>and the response body MAY be empty. Note that the HTTP [RFC 2616] > >>>specification states "the 202 response is intentionally > > > > non-committal". > > > >>>As such, any content in the response body, including a SOAP body, > > > > MAY or > > > >>s/SOAP body/SOAP Envelope/ > >> > >> > >>>MAY not be an expected SOAP response. > >> > >>s/MAY not/MAY NOT/ > >> > >> > >>> > >>> > >>>Old text: > >>> > >>>This SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP binding can be used for > >>>sending request messages with an optional response. For such > > > > messages, > > > >>>the HTTP [RFC 2616] > >>> > >> > > <file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\dorchard\Local%20Settings\Tempora > > ry > > > > %20Internet%20Files\OLK6\soap11reqoptresphttpbinding.html#RFC2616#RFC261 > > 6> > > > >>>response MUST be a 202 status code and the response body MAY be > > > > empty. > > > >>> > >>> > >>>Cheers, > >>> > >>>Dave > >>> > > > >
Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 21:28:21 UTC