- From: Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:12:55 -0500
- To: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
Hi Paul,
I have two questions regarding your proposed text.
1. What is the scope of the sentence you are proposing to add below?
2. Do you intend to in say that WSA-SOAP binding spec does not assign any
semantics to an anonymous URI in the destination but that specific
transports could fill in those semantics?
Thanks,
Paco
                                                                                                                                         
                      <paul.downey@bt.com>                                                                                               
                      Sent by:                        To:       <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>                                            
                      public-ws-addressing-req        cc:                                                                                
                      uest@w3.org                     Subject:  Proposed text for CR18                                                   
                                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                         
                      02/09/2006 06:35 AM                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                         
In our Core specification for anonymous URI, we say:
  """
  The precise meaning of this URI is defined by the binding of
  Addressing to a specific protocol..
  """
Section 3.5 of the SOAP Binding "Use of Anonymous Address in SOAP"
states the meaning of anonymous addresses in practical terms
when moving messages down a channel.
To explicitly state the Status Quo, I suggest adding the
following sentence:
  """
  A value of "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" for
  the [destination] property implies no particular semantics.
  """
Paul
Received on Sunday, 12 February 2006 18:13:04 UTC