- From: Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:09:05 -0500
- To: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
As I said in my earlier mail, this would be the text to include in section
3.5:
"When the HTTP transport is in use, the anonymous URI is only used to
indicate the use of the HTTP reply channel so it can only appear as the
value of the [destination] property in reply messages."
Paco
David Hull
<dmh@tibco.com> To: Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
public-ws-addressing-req Subject: Re: CR20 proposal
uest@w3.org
02/12/2006 02:22 PM
Francisco Curbera wrote:
>As per Bob's request, and for easier reference, this is a more detailed
>version of the proposal for closing CR20 that we discussed on the last
>call:
>
>Middle of the road approach: retain the defaulting of the To header to
>anonymous, but re-state (in section 3.2 of the Core spec) that the use of
>the anonymous URI in the destination field is actually dependent on the
>interpretation that the transport binding gives to the anonymous URI. Add
a
>note in Section 3.5 of the SOAP spec indicating that for the case of the
>HTTP transport the anonymous URI is only used to indicate the use of the
>HTTP reply channel so it can only be used in reply messages.
>
>
Could you please state this in the form of an amendment to the text
accepted for section 3.5 in the resolution to CR 15 [1]? While this
text has not yet been incorporated into the editors' draft yet, I
believe it represents the latest draft of that section.
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Jan/0085
>Paco
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 04:09:16 UTC