RE: CR 20: amalgamated proposal

How about omitting the word "default"? "Additionally, this is the value of [destination] for a message where wsa:To has not been specified."
 
Tony Rogers
CA, Inc
Senior Architect, Development
tony.rogers@ca.com
co-chair UDDI TC at OASIS
co-chair WS-Desc WG at W3C

________________________________

From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org on behalf of Anish Karmarkar
Sent: Fri 17-Feb-06 10:42
To: Marc Hadley
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subject: Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal




Yes.
That is what we meant to say.
Your wordings are much better. Thx.

-Anish
--

Marc Hadley wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Anish Karmarkar wrote:
>
>>
>> {The next 2 paras below are new}
>> Messages on such a channel must have a [destination] property value of
>> "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous". Additionally,  this is
>> the default value of such responses if the [destination] value is not
>> specified.
>>
> Shouldn't that last sentence read: "Additionally this is the default 
> value of [destination] in such responses if wsa:To is omitted" ? I.e. 
> you need to introduce the syntactic default that allows you to omit 
> wsa:To even though [destination] has a required value.
>
> Marc.
>
>> Outside of this usage, this specification assigns no particular
>> semantics to the use of "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/ anonymous"
>> for the [destination] property in this binding.
>>
>>
>> -Paco & Anish
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---
> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
> Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
>
>