- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:10:43 -0500
- To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
In the scenario under discussion, does the client understand that it's dealing with a queue and therefore always expects the 202? Or does the client think it's interacting with a "service" and therefore the 202 indicates - after the fact - the exceptional condition that the service actually behaved like a queue for that exchange? If the former, then 200 could be used as a response code instead of 202, since if the client knew it was a queue then the "result of processing" would be the result of processing by the queue. Mark.
Received on Friday, 3 February 2006 22:10:47 UTC