- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:26:26 -0500
- To: Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
On 2/12/06, Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > As I said in my earlier mail, this would be the text to include in section > 3.5: > > "When the HTTP transport is in use, the anonymous URI is only used to > indicate the use of the HTTP reply channel so it can only appear as the > value of the [destination] property in reply messages." Is that normative? Mark.
Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 15:26:38 UTC