- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:09:30 -0000
- To: <dmh@tibco.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
> Case 1 seems almost pointless. If all I need to know is that you got > the message, any HTTP response will do. Case 1 seems very useful in scenarios which abstract away the transport and want to process at the SOAP level regardless of how the messages are exchanged. > Case 2 seems much more useful. In this case the HTTP response (whatever > it is) means you got the message, while the WS-RX ack means something > else, e.g., you were able to forward it on and it reached its final > destination. AIUI Case 2 would best be handled by moving a 'window' forward rather than sending a box-car of acknowledgements, no? (my understanding of RX is rather minimal, so I could be talking out of my hat). Paul
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2006 19:09:38 UTC