public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org from April 2024 by date

Tuesday, 30 April 2024

• Re: The singleton property option Thompson, Bryan
• Re: The singleton property option Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: The way forward Thompson, Bryan
• Re: The singleton property option Thompson, Bryan
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)
• Re: The way forward Lassila, Ora
• Re: The singleton property option Thomas Lörtsch

Monday, 29 April 2024

• Re: The way forward Kurt Cagle
• Re: The way forward Niklas Lindström
• Re: The singleton property option Thompson, Bryan
• Re: The way forward Thompson, Bryan

Saturday, 27 April 2024

• Re: My opinion of today on the profiles proposal Niklas Lindström

Friday, 26 April 2024

• The singleton property option Niklas Lindström
• Re: The way forward Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: My opinion of today on the profiles proposal Olaf Hartig
• Re: My opinion of today on the profiles proposal Franconi Enrico
• Re: The way forward Niklas Lindström
• Question on transformation of multiple triple reifier to single triple reifier Sasaki, Felix
• Re: My opinion of today on the profiles proposal Olaf Hartig

Thursday, 25 April 2024

• Re: The way forward Thompson, Bryan
• Re: The way forward Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: The way forward Thompson, Bryan
• My opinion of today on the profiles proposal Franconi Enrico
• Re: The way forward Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: The way forward Thompson, Bryan
• Re: [a] way forward Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [a] way forward Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: [a] way forward Lassila, Ora
• AW: This week's discussion Doerthe Arndt
• Re: [a] way forward Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [a] way forward Thomas Lörtsch
• AW: Understanding reifiers and edges Sasaki, Felix
• AW: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") Sasaki, Felix
• Re: [a] way forward Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: [a] way forward James Anderson
• Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") Kurt Cagle
• The way forward Lassila, Ora

Wednesday, 24 April 2024

• Re: Understanding reifiers and edges Niklas Lindström
• AW: Understanding reifiers and edges Sasaki, Felix
• AW: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") Sasaki, Felix
• Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Understanding reifiers and edges Niklas Lindström
• Re: Different properties related to well-formedness Olaf Hartig
• Re: Different properties related to well-formedness Olaf Hartig
• Re: Different properties related to well-formedness Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Different properties related to well-formedness Olaf Hartig
• Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification Andy Seaborne
• Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification Adrian Gschwend

Tuesday, 23 April 2024

• An LPG multiedge reification use case Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Different properties related to well-formedness Gregg Kellogg
• Understanding reifiers and edges Niklas Lindström
• AW: possible stances with respect to multiple reification Doerthe Arndt
• Re: Different properties related to well-formedness Antoine Zimmermann
• Different properties related to well-formedness Olaf Hartig

Monday, 22 April 2024

• illegality of multiple reification Jos De Roo (UGent-imec)
• Re: Adjusting the suggested RDF-star naming notation Andy Seaborne
• Re: This week's discussion ddooss@wp.pl
• Re: This week's discussion Gregg Kellogg
• Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification Jos De Roo
• Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification Franconi Enrico
• Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification Franconi Enrico
• Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification Jos De Roo
• Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification Franconi Enrico
• Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification Franconi Enrico
• Re: Adjusting the suggested RDF-star naming notation Niklas Lindström
• Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification Lassila, Ora
• possible stances with respect to multiple reification Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• This week's discussion Adrian Gschwend
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)
• Re: Is it even possible to align RDF with LPGs via reification? Jos De Roo
• Re: Is it even possible to align RDF with LPGs via reification? Gregg Kellogg

Sunday, 21 April 2024

• Is it even possible to align RDF with LPGs via reification? Luke VanderHart

Saturday, 20 April 2024

• Community impressions Sasaki, Felix

Friday, 19 April 2024

• Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") Kurt Cagle
• Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") ddooss@wp.pl
• Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") Kurt Cagle
• Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") Kurt Cagle
• Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") Kurt Cagle
• AW: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") Sasaki, Felix
• Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") Kurt Cagle
• Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") ddooss@wp.pl
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Thompson, Bryan
• Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Gregory Williams
• Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") Kurt Cagle
• Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") Kurt Cagle
• reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Thomas Lörtsch
• Suggestion reintroducing triple terms, dropping rdf:reifies Jerven Tjalling Bolleman
• Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Franconi Enrico
• Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Lassila, Ora

Thursday, 18 April 2024

• Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: AW: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Niklas Lindström
• Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Gregory Williams
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: restrict rdf:reifies to many-to-one and use rdf:memberReifier to allow multi-set of triple-terms Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Niklas Lindström
• Re: restrict rdf:reifies to many-to-one and use rdf:memberReifier to allow multi-set of triple-terms Franconi Enrico
• restrict rdf:reifies to many-to-one and use rdf:memberReifier to allow multi-set of triple-terms Souripriya Das
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Franconi Enrico
• Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Franconi Enrico
• AW: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Doerthe Arndt
• AW: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Doerthe Arndt
• Re: AW: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Pierre-Antoine Champin
• AW: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Sasaki, Felix
• AW: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Sasaki, Felix

Wednesday, 17 April 2024

• Re: Support for reified sets Pierre-Antoine Champin
• proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" Pierre-Antoine Champin
• What does it mean to refiy several things? (Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs) Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Support for reified sets Franconi Enrico

Tuesday, 16 April 2024

• Support for reified sets Luke VanderHart

Wednesday, 17 April 2024

• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs IGNACIO DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ-CASANUEVA
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Lassila, Ora
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Phil Barker

Tuesday, 16 April 2024

• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Thompson, Bryan
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Thomas Lörtsch

Monday, 15 April 2024

• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Thompson, Bryan
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: [External] : Re: use of multi-valued rdf:reifies removes ability to annotate individual triple-patterns Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Thompson, Bryan
• Re: use of multi-valued rdf:reifies removes ability to annotate individual triple-patterns Niklas Lindström
• Re: [External] : Re: use of multi-valued rdf:reifies removes ability to annotate individual triple-patterns Souripriya Das
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Andy Seaborne
• Re: [External] : Re: use of multi-valued rdf:reifies removes ability to annotate individual triple-patterns Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• AW: Local community feedback on current proposal Sasaki, Felix
• Re: Local community feedback on current proposal Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: [External] : Re: use of multi-valued rdf:reifies removes ability to annotate individual triple-patterns Souripriya Das

Sunday, 14 April 2024

• Re: a modest proposal - eliminate reifiers completely Kurt Cagle
• Re: use of multi-valued rdf:reifies removes ability to annotate individual triple-patterns Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: a modest proposal - eliminate reifiers completely Andy Seaborne
• use of multi-valued rdf:reifies removes ability to annotate individual triple-patterns Souripriya Das
• Local community feedback on current proposal Sasaki, Felix

Friday, 12 April 2024

• Re: a modest proposal - eliminate reifiers completely Kurt Cagle
• Re: a modest proposal - eliminate reifiers completely Kurt Cagle
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Gregory Williams
• Re: a modest proposal - eliminate reifiers completely Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: a modest proposal - eliminate reifiers completely Niklas Lindström
• Re: LPG-RDF1.2 interoperability is already nontrivial due to weakness of LPG edge-property vs RDF1.2 statement-about-statement Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs James Anderson
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Lassila, Ora
• a modest proposal - eliminate reifiers completely Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• AW: LPG-RDF1.2 interoperability is already nontrivial due to weakness of LPG edge-property vs RDF1.2 statement-about-statement Sasaki, Felix
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs James Anderson
• need for reifiers Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: LPG-RDF1.2 interoperability is already nontrivial due to weakness of LPG edge-property vs RDF1.2 statement-about-statement Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs James Anderson
• Community input to current discussion Sasaki, Felix
• AW: LPG-RDF1.2 interoperability is already nontrivial due to weakness of LPG edge-property vs RDF1.2 statement-about-statement Sasaki, Felix
• Re: LPG-RDF1.2 interoperability is already nontrivial due to weakness of LPG edge-property vs RDF1.2 statement-about-statement Thomas Lörtsch
• AW: LPG-RDF1.2 interoperability is already nontrivial due to weakness of LPG edge-property vs RDF1.2 statement-about-statement Sasaki, Felix
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Lassila, Ora

Thursday, 11 April 2024

• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs James Anderson
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Gregg Kellogg
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• LPG-RDF1.2 interoperability is already nontrivial due to weakness of LPG edge-property vs RDF1.2 statement-about-statement Souripriya Das
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Lassila, Ora
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Andy Seaborne
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Niklas Lindström
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Thomas Lörtsch

Wednesday, 10 April 2024

• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting Dave Raggett
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting Antoine Zimmermann
• AW: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Sasaki, Felix
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting Gregory Williams
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Thompson, Bryan

Tuesday, 9 April 2024

• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Thompson, Bryan
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Kurt Cagle
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Thompson, Bryan
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Kurt Cagle
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Lassila, Ora
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Thompson, Bryan
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Kurt Cagle
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting Adrian Gschwend
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Thompson, Bryan
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting Olaf Hartig
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting Gregg Kellogg
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)
• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs James Anderson
• Event Invitation: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting Pierre-Antoine Champin (W3C Calendar)
• AW: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Sasaki, Felix

Monday, 8 April 2024

• Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs James Anderson
• A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs Lassila, Ora

Friday, 5 April 2024

• Re: A single reifier can reify more than one triple term Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 4 April 2024

• Re: A single reifier can reify more than one triple term Ted Thibodeau Jr

Wednesday, 3 April 2024

• Regrets Lassila, Ora
• Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one Thomas Lörtsch
• Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one Andy Seaborne
• Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one Kurt Cagle
• Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one Gregg Kellogg
• Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one Kurt Cagle
• Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one Franconi Enrico
• Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one Gregory Williams
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Olaf Hartig
• Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one Franconi Enrico
• Re: Regrets X3 Adrian Gschwend
• Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 2 April 2024

• Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one Franconi Enrico
• Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one Andy Seaborne
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Gregory Williams
• Regrets X3 Erich Bremer
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2024 19:46:57 UTC