- From: Thompson, Bryan <bryant@amazon.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:06:49 +0000
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, "public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2024 23:06:55 UTC
I do not believe that you answered my question Peter. What do you want to call that set of Subject Predicate Object tuples? At any rate, I will call it a graph and your proposal is making statements about those sets. E.g., Statements about Graphs. Bryan ________________________________ From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2024 4:04:46 PM To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] The way forward CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. This is a fundamental misconception. Consider complex numbers. They are an ordered pair of real numbers, but there is no way that every ordered pair of real numbers has to be considered a complex number. Similarly a set of RDF triples, let alone several RDF triples not collected into a set, is not necessarily an RDF graph. peter On 4/25/24 13:48, Thompson, Bryan wrote: > What do you call a set of S, P, O tuples? I call it a Graph. Your proposal is to reify such sets. Hence, Statements about Graphs. > > Bryan
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2024 23:06:55 UTC