Adrian Gschwend
Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)
Andy Seaborne
- Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification (Wednesday, 24 April)
- Re: Adjusting the suggested RDF-star naming notation (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: a modest proposal - eliminate reifiers completely (Sunday, 14 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: A single reifier can reify more than one triple term (Friday, 5 April)
- Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one (Tuesday, 2 April)
Antoine Zimmermann
Dave Raggett
ddooss@wp.pl
Doerthe Arndt
Erich Bremer
Franconi Enrico
- Re: My opinion of today on the profiles proposal (Friday, 26 April)
- My opinion of today on the profiles proposal (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" (Friday, 19 April)
- Re: restrict rdf:reifies to many-to-one and use rdf:memberReifier to allow multi-set of triple-terms (Thursday, 18 April)
- Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Thursday, 18 April)
- Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" (Thursday, 18 April)
- Re: Support for reified sets (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one (Tuesday, 2 April)
Gregg Kellogg
Gregory Williams
IGNACIO DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ-CASANUEVA
James Anderson
- Re: [a] way forward (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Monday, 8 April)
Jerven Tjalling Bolleman
Jos De Roo
Jos De Roo (UGent-imec)
Kurt Cagle
- Re: The way forward (Monday, 29 April)
- Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") (Friday, 19 April)
- Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") (Friday, 19 April)
- Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") (Friday, 19 April)
- Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") (Friday, 19 April)
- Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") (Friday, 19 April)
- Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") (Friday, 19 April)
- Re: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") (Friday, 19 April)
- Re: a modest proposal - eliminate reifiers completely (Sunday, 14 April)
- Re: a modest proposal - eliminate reifiers completely (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: a modest proposal - eliminate reifiers completely (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one (Wednesday, 3 April)
Lassila, Ora
- Re: The way forward (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [a] way forward (Thursday, 25 April)
- The way forward (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" (Friday, 19 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 9 April)
- A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Monday, 8 April)
- Regrets (Wednesday, 3 April)
Luke VanderHart
Niklas Lindström
- Re: The way forward (Monday, 29 April)
- Re: My opinion of today on the profiles proposal (Saturday, 27 April)
- The singleton property option (Friday, 26 April)
- Re: The way forward (Friday, 26 April)
- Re: Understanding reifiers and edges (Wednesday, 24 April)
- Re: Understanding reifiers and edges (Wednesday, 24 April)
- Understanding reifiers and edges (Tuesday, 23 April)
- Re: Adjusting the suggested RDF-star naming notation (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: AW: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" (Thursday, 18 April)
- Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Thursday, 18 April)
- Re: use of multi-valued rdf:reifies removes ability to annotate individual triple-patterns (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: a modest proposal - eliminate reifiers completely (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Thursday, 11 April)
Olaf Hartig
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: The singleton property option (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: The way forward (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: The way forward (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: [a] way forward (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: [a] way forward (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: possible stances with respect to multiple reification (Monday, 22 April)
- possible stances with respect to multiple reification (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: [External] : Re: use of multi-valued rdf:reifies removes ability to annotate individual triple-patterns (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: [External] : Re: use of multi-valued rdf:reifies removes ability to annotate individual triple-patterns (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: use of multi-valued rdf:reifies removes ability to annotate individual triple-patterns (Sunday, 14 April)
- Re: a modest proposal - eliminate reifiers completely (Friday, 12 April)
- a modest proposal - eliminate reifiers completely (Friday, 12 April)
- need for reifiers (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 9 April)
Phil Barker
Pierre-Antoine Champin
Pierre-Antoine Champin (W3C Calendar)
Sasaki, Felix
- Question on transformation of multiple triple reifier to single triple reifier (Friday, 26 April)
- AW: Understanding reifiers and edges (Thursday, 25 April)
- AW: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") (Thursday, 25 April)
- AW: Understanding reifiers and edges (Wednesday, 24 April)
- AW: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") (Wednesday, 24 April)
- Community impressions (Saturday, 20 April)
- AW: reifiesDomain-14 (Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing") (Friday, 19 April)
- AW: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" (Thursday, 18 April)
- AW: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Thursday, 18 April)
- AW: Local community feedback on current proposal (Monday, 15 April)
- Local community feedback on current proposal (Sunday, 14 April)
- AW: LPG-RDF1.2 interoperability is already nontrivial due to weakness of LPG edge-property vs RDF1.2 statement-about-statement (Friday, 12 April)
- Community input to current discussion (Friday, 12 April)
- AW: LPG-RDF1.2 interoperability is already nontrivial due to weakness of LPG edge-property vs RDF1.2 statement-about-statement (Friday, 12 April)
- AW: LPG-RDF1.2 interoperability is already nontrivial due to weakness of LPG edge-property vs RDF1.2 statement-about-statement (Friday, 12 April)
- AW: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Wednesday, 10 April)
- AW: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 9 April)
Souripriya Das
Ted Thibodeau Jr
Thomas Lörtsch
- Re: The singleton property option (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: The way forward (Friday, 26 April)
- Re: [a] way forward (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: [a] way forward (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" (Wednesday, 24 April)
- An LPG multiedge reification use case (Tuesday, 23 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Friday, 19 April)
- Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" (Friday, 19 April)
- Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" (Friday, 19 April)
- Re: proposal: a reifier should reify only one "thing" (Thursday, 18 April)
- Re: restrict rdf:reifies to many-to-one and use rdf:memberReifier to allow multi-set of triple-terms (Thursday, 18 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 16 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: Local community feedback on current proposal (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: LPG-RDF1.2 interoperability is already nontrivial due to weakness of LPG edge-property vs RDF1.2 statement-about-statement (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: LPG-RDF1.2 interoperability is already nontrivial due to weakness of LPG edge-property vs RDF1.2 statement-about-statement (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: LPG-RDF1.2 interoperability is already nontrivial due to weakness of LPG edge-property vs RDF1.2 statement-about-statement (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: rdf:reifies many-to-many vs. many-to-one (Wednesday, 3 April)
Thompson, Bryan
- Re: The singleton property option (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: The way forward (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: The singleton property option (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: The singleton property option (Monday, 29 April)
- Re: The way forward (Monday, 29 April)
- Re: The way forward (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: The way forward (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: The way forward (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Friday, 19 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 16 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Wednesday, 10 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: A few thoughts on RDF-star, Reification, and Labeled Property Graphs (Tuesday, 9 April)
Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2024 19:46:57 UTC