public-payments-wg@w3.org from April 2016 by author

Adam Roach

• Re: Proposed agenda for our call tomorrow (28th April at 16h00 UTC) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Friday, 22 April)

Adrian Bateman

• RE: Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Thursday, 21 April)
• RE: WPWG Priorities (Thursday, 21 April)
• RE: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Thursday, 7 April)

Adrian Hope-Bailie

• Payment Method Identifiers (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How can a Web Based Payment App cancel the payment flow? (#128) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposed agenda for our call tomorrow (28th April at 16h00 UTC) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Priorities (was: Re: Proposed agenda for our call tomorrow (28th April at 16h00 UTC)) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Call for Participation - making it a little easier to contribute (Monday, 25 April)
• Updates to work process (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] New Architecture Proposal (#125) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] New Architecture Proposal (#125) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] New Architecture Proposal (#125) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: WPWG Priorities (Thursday, 21 April)
• [w3c/webpayments] Fix section indents on Arch proposal (#127) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Fix section indents on Arch proposal (#127) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Minor HTML typo on Arch proposal (#126) (Thursday, 21 April)
• [w3c/webpayments] Minor HTML typo on Arch proposal (#126) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Add Web Payments Core Messages spec to proposals. (#119) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Apply review comments by Ian Jacobs to HTTP API. (#120) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] New Architecture Proposal (#125) (Thursday, 21 April)
• [w3c/webpayments] New Architecture Proposal (#125) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Add Web Payments Core Messages spec to proposals. (#119) (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Payment Methods vs Payment Instruments (#124) (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Payment Methods vs Payment Instruments (#124) (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Proposals should be marked as unofficial (#123) (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Proposals should be marked as unofficial (#122) (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Proposals should be marked as unofficial (#121) (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: Transition Request for 3 Payments Specifications (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: Decision [Was: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG] (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: App supports method but user has no instrument for that method (#110) (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: App supports method but user has no instrument for that method (#110) (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: App supports method but user has no instrument for that method (#110) (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: App supports method but user has no instrument for that method (#110) (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Call to Review - Get involved (Wednesday, 13 April)
• API complexity (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How do we transition users and merchants from the current system to using the new API and apps? (#94) (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Review: UPI - a method and standard that went BETA in India (#100) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Review: UPI - a method and standard that went BETA in India (#100) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] ACTION: Refactor flows to use common terminology and entry/exit points (#49) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Confusion over payment flow (#10) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] ACTION: Refactor flows to use common terminology and entry/exit points (#49) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Confusion over payment flow (#10) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Synonym Mapping from Web Environment Terminology to ISO 20022 Terminonogy (#95) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Synonym Mapping from Web Environment Terminology to ISO 20022 Terminonogy (#95) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] ACTION: Refactor flows to use common terminology and entry/exit points (#49) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Document relationship diagrams? (#24) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Document relationship diagrams? (#24) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Confusion over payment flow (#10) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How do we prevent keyboard hooking during payment? (#90) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Transition and Adoption (#94) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Should we be publishing a specification for an HTTP API? (#17) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Should we be publishing a specification for an HTTP API? (#17) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] PROPOSAL: Pass the list of supported payment methods and the method-specific data in a single object (#77) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] PROPOSAL: Pass the list of supported payment methods and the method-specific data in a single object (#77) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Should the Web Payments API cater for the invoicing part of the full web purchase flow ? (#60) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] What is the appropriate conversational pattern for the API? (#55) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Should we standardise a callback mechanism for payment apps to communicate to 3rd parties? (#76) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Should we standardise a callback mechanism for payment apps to communicate to 3rd parties? (#76) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How do we protect certain data in the messages from certain parties in the flow as the use case requires? (#78) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Call for Review: Proposals for discussion on 21 April (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Gh pages (#118) (Sunday, 10 April)
• [w3c/webpayments] Gh pages (#118) (Sunday, 10 April)
• [w3c/webpayments] Update reference labels to match other docs (#117) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Payment logic in the Browser (was Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Agenda for Thursday 7 April WG call (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Proposal for a Payment Apps spec (#116) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• [w3c/webpayments] Proposal for a Payment Apps spec (#116) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: Update of CfC - Negative amounts (Monday, 4 April)
• Update of CfC - Negative amounts (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Add Web Payments CG HTTP API specification to list of proposals. (#115) (Monday, 4 April)

Anders Rundgren

• Re: Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: Decision [Was: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG] (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: Decision [Was: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG] (Friday, 15 April)
• Security of the solution. Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: Payment logic in the Browser (was Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Wednesday, 6 April)

Chaals McCathie Nevile

• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Wednesday, 13 April)

Christopher Allen

• Re: Proposed agenda for our call tomorrow (28th April at 16h00 UTC) (Thursday, 28 April)

Dave Longley

• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How can a Web Based Payment App cancel the payment flow? (#128) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How can a Web Based Payment App cancel the payment flow? (#128) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How can a Web Based Payment App cancel the payment flow? (#128) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How can a Web Based Payment App cancel the payment flow? (#128) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How can a Web Based Payment App cancel the payment flow? (#128) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: App supports method but user has no instrument for that method (#110) (Wednesday, 13 April)

David Ezell

• RE: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Thursday, 7 April)

David Illsley

• Re: Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Tuesday, 12 April)

David Jackson

• RE: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Thursday, 7 April)

Dipan Anarkat

• Re: Reminder: Deadline today at 1pm ET [Was: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG] (Tuesday, 12 April)

Gregory Estrade

• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Sunday, 10 April)

Ian Jacobs

• [Minutes] 28 April WPWG teleconference (Thursday, 28 April)
• Notes on Payment Apps (registration, etc.) (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Friday, 22 April)
• Three Web Payments FPWDs published (Thursday, 21 April)
• [Agenda] 21 April 2016 WPWG teleconference (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Transition Request for 3 Payments Specifications (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Transition Request for 3 Payments Specifications (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Communications plans and activities you can do around FPWDs on 21 April (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Transition Request for 3 Payments Specifications (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: Transition Request for 3 Payments Specifications (Monday, 18 April)
• Fwd: Transition Request for 3 Payments Specifications (Saturday, 16 April)
• Decision [Was: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG] (Thursday, 14 April)
• [Minutes] 14 April 2016 WPWG teleconference (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: Comments on Web Payments HTTP API 1.0 (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: Comments on Web Payments HTTP API 1.0 (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Comments on Web Payments HTTP API 1.0 (Tuesday, 12 April)
• [Agenda] 14 April 2016 WPWG teleconference (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Reminder: Deadline today at 1pm ET [Was: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG] (Tuesday, 12 April)
• On Three Addresses [Was: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG] (Thursday, 7 April)
• Draft FAQ to accompany FPWDs - comments welcome (Thursday, 7 April)
• [Minutes] 7 April 2016 WPWG teleconference (Thursday, 7 April)
• Two high-level comments on "Payment Apps" draft (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: Basic CT-DD Payment.doc (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Updated "How the Working Group works" (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: Update of CfC - Negative amounts (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: Update on getting to a Call for Consensus (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: Update of CfC - Negative amounts (Monday, 4 April)

ianbjacobs

• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How can a Web Based Payment App cancel the payment flow? (#128) (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] New Architecture Proposal (#125) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] New Architecture Proposal (#125) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] New Architecture Proposal (#125) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How do we transition users and merchants from the current system to using the new API and apps? (#94) (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Payment Methods vs Payment Instruments (#124) (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: App supports method but user has no instrument for that method (#110) (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: App supports method but user has no instrument for that method (#110) (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Create an FAQ (#114) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] ACTION: Summarize arguments for/against shipping address capture (#72) (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] ACTION: Summarize arguments for/against shipping address capture (#72) (Tuesday, 5 April)

Jason Normore

• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Monday, 11 April)

Jeff Burdges

• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: App supports method but user has no instrument for that method (#110) (Thursday, 14 April)

Joerg.Heuer@telekom.de

• RE: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Monday, 11 April)

Lars Erik Bolstad

• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Friday, 8 April)

Leandro Bernal Minniti

• RES: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Monday, 11 April)

Manu Sporny

• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How can a Web Based Payment App cancel the payment flow? (#128) (Friday, 29 April)
• Priorities (was: Re: Proposed agenda for our call tomorrow (28th April at 16h00 UTC)) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Comments on Web Payments HTTP API 1.0 (Thursday, 28 April)
• Call for reviews of HTTP API and Core Messages proposals (Thursday, 28 April)
• Heads up on HTTP API and Core Messages chats (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Add Web Payments Core Messages spec to proposals. (#119) (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] New Architecture Proposal (#125) (Thursday, 21 April)
• Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Transition Request for 3 Payments Specifications (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Transition Request for 3 Payments Specifications (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Proposals should be marked as unofficial (#123) (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Proposals should be marked as unofficial (#121) (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: Comments on Web Payments HTTP API 1.0 (Wednesday, 13 April)
• [w3c/webpayments] Apply review comments by Ian Jacobs to HTTP API. (#120) (Wednesday, 13 April)
• [w3c/webpayments] Add Web Payments Core Messages spec to proposals. (#119) (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Wednesday, 6 April)
• [w3c/webpayments] Add Web Payments CG HTTP API specification to list of proposals. (#115) (Monday, 4 April)

Marcos Cáceres

• [w3c/webpayments] Proposals should be marked as unofficial (#123) (Friday, 15 April)
• [w3c/webpayments] Proposals should be marked as unofficial (#122) (Friday, 15 April)
• [w3c/webpayments] Proposals should be marked as unofficial (#121) (Friday, 15 April)

Matt Saxon

• RE: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Friday, 8 April)

mattsaxon

• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How do we transition users and merchants from the current system to using the new API and apps? (#94) (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How do we transition users and merchants from the current system to using the new API and apps? (#94) (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How do we transition users and merchants from the current system to using the new API and apps? (#94) (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How do we transition users and merchants from the current system to using the new API and apps? (#94) (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How do we transition users and merchants from the current system to using the new API and apps? (#94) (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Synonym Mapping from Web Environment Terminology to ISO 20022 Terminonogy (#95) (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Synonym Mapping from Web Environment Terminology to ISO 20022 Terminonogy (#95) (Tuesday, 12 April)

Melvin Carvalho

• Re: Transition Request for 3 Payments Specifications (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Reminder: Deadline today at 1pm ET [Was: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG] (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Monday, 11 April)

Michael[tm] Smith

• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Create an FAQ (#114) (Sunday, 10 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Create an FAQ (#114) (Sunday, 10 April)
• [w3c/webpayments] Create an FAQ (#114) (Saturday, 2 April)

Nick Shearer

• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Tuesday, 12 April)

Rouslan Solomakhin

• Re: WPWG Priorities (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Tuesday, 5 April)

Roy McElmurry

• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Saturday, 9 April)

Sebastien Domergue

• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How do we transition users and merchants from the current system to using the new API and apps? (#94) (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How do we transition users and merchants from the current system to using the new API and apps? (#94) (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: App supports method but user has no instrument for that method (#110) (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How do we transition users and merchants from the current system to using the new API and apps? (#94) (Wednesday, 13 April)

Shane McCarron

• Fwd: Spec-Ops comments on Web Payments HTTP API 1.0 (Thursday, 28 April)
• Fwd: Spec-Ops Comments on Web Payments Core Messages 1.0 (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Transition Request for 3 Payments Specifications (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: Transition Request for 3 Payments Specifications (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: App supports method but user has no instrument for that method (#110) (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: App supports method but user has no instrument for that method (#110) (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Tuesday, 12 April)

Telford-Reed, Nick

• RE: Call for reviews of HTTP API and Core Messages proposals (Friday, 29 April)
• Proposed agenda for our call tomorrow (28th April at 16h00 UTC) (Wednesday, 27 April)
• RE: Transition Request for 3 Payments Specifications (Monday, 18 April)
• Face to face (Friday, 1 April)

Tommy Thorsen

• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How can a Web Based Payment App cancel the payment flow? (#128) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How can a Web Based Payment App cancel the payment flow? (#128) (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How can a Web Based Payment App cancel the payment flow? (#128) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] How can a Web Based Payment App cancel the payment flow? (#128) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• [w3c/webpayments] How can a Web Based Payment App cancel the payment flow? (#128) (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Payment Methods vs Payment Instruments (#124) (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Payment Methods vs Payment Instruments (#124) (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: [w3c/webpayments] Payment Methods vs Payment Instruments (#124) (Tuesday, 19 April)
• [w3c/webpayments] Payment Methods vs Payment Instruments (#124) (Tuesday, 19 April)

VIGNET cyril

• RE: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Basic CT-DD Payment.doc (Wednesday, 6 April)

Wayne Carr

• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Saturday, 9 April)

Web Payments Working Group Issue Tracker

• wpwg-ACTION-19: Review the extensibility wiki by 21 april (Thursday, 14 April)
• wpwg-ACTION-18: Review extensibility wiki by april 20th. (Thursday, 14 April)

Xueyuan Jia

• Call for Exclusions: Payment Request API; Payment Method Identifiers (Thursday, 21 April)

yaso

• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Monday, 11 April)

Zach Koch

• Re: Review of Payment Apps Proposal (Sunday, 24 April)
• WPWG Priorities (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Agenda for Thursday 7 April WG call (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Wednesday, 6 April)
• Re: Update of CfC - Negative amounts (Monday, 4 April)

段超(泰麒)

• 答复: CfC to publish documents as FPWD of the Web Payments WG (Wednesday, 13 April)

Last message date: Friday, 29 April 2016 14:30:59 UTC